Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Rapid methods in microbiology for in-office testing.

C A Needham

    Clinics in Laboratory Medicine
    |June 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Choosing rapid diagnostic tests for common ambulatory infections requires careful consideration of objectives, disease prevalence, and test accuracy. Evaluating technical features and cost-benefit is crucial for effective implementation.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Filling the waiting time in the clinic with education about glaucoma.

    Insight (American Society of Ophthalmic Registered Nurses)·2001
    Same author

    Use of a high-sensitivity rapid strep test without culture confirmation of negative results: 2 years' experience.

    The Journal of family practice·2000
    Same author

    Streptococcal pharyngitis: impact of a high-sensitivity antigen test on physician outcome.

    Journal of clinical microbiology·1998
    Same author

    Postmarketing surveillance of oral terbinafine in the UK: report of a large cohort study.

    British journal of clinical pharmacology·1996
    Same author

    Comparison of conventional stool concentration and preserved-smear methods with Merifluor Cryptosporidium/Giardia Direct Immunofluorescence Assay and ProSpecT Giardia EZ Microplate Assay for detection of Giardia lamblia.

    Journal of clinical microbiology·1995
    Same author

    Cyclospora species as a gastrointestinal pathogen in immunocompetent hosts.

    Journal of clinical microbiology·1995
    Same journal

    Advances in Hemostasis Laboratory Testing.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Extracellular Vesicles in Hemostasis.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Thrombin Generation Assay: Ready for Prime Time.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Viscoelastic Testing for the Laboratorian: Recent Advances and Practical Advice.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    Same journal

    Practical Recommendations for Harmonization of Hemostasis Testing Across Hospital Sites.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    Same journal

    The Role of Hypoxia in Vascular Endothelial Dysfunction and Venous Thromboembolism.

    Clinics in laboratory medicine·2026
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical diagnostics
    • Ambulatory medicine
    • Infectious disease testing

    Background:

    • Rapid test methods are available for common ambulatory infections like pharyngitis, urinary tract infections, and venereal diseases.
    • Implementation requires careful consideration of various factors beyond just test availability.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To outline key considerations for selecting and implementing rapid diagnostic tests in ambulatory settings.
    • To emphasize the importance of aligning test objectives with patient needs and clinical workflow.

    Main Methods:

    • Discussion of critical factors influencing diagnostic test selection.
    • Analysis of test performance characteristics, including timeliness and predictive values.
    • Evaluation of technical requirements, quality control, and cost-effectiveness.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Test selection must align with specific objectives, such as same-day diagnosis.
    • Disease prevalence significantly impacts the predictive value of test results (positive and negative).
    • Technical feasibility, required skill level, quality control, and equipment needs are vital assessment points.

    Conclusions:

    • On-site testing requires a thorough evaluation of its impact on diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making.
    • The cost-benefit ratio of on-site testing versus external laboratory referral must be assessed.
    • Understanding false-positive and false-negative implications is essential to avoid diagnostic errors.