Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Combination of High Ligation and Intraoperative Embolization using Polidocanol for Treatment of Varicoceles
Published on: December 22, 2023
Effects of Pharmacologic Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Benign Hysterectomy
Jennifer Travieso1, Neil Kamdar2, Daniel M Morgan3
1Department of Women's Health, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin (Dr. Travieso), Austin, Texas.
Study Objective:
To evaluate whether the addition of pharmacologic prophylaxis to mechanical prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with changes in perioperative outcomes in hysterectomy for benign indications.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative database.
Patients:
Patients who underwent hysterectomy between July 2012 and June 2015 when VTE prophylaxis data were collected.
Interventions:
Patients who received mechanical prophylaxis alone were compared with those receiving dual prophylaxis (mechanical and pharmacologic). Minimally invasive surgeries (MIS) included laparoscopic, vaginal, robotic-assisted, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomies and were analyzed separately from abdominal (ABD) hysterectomy.
Measurements And Main Results:
Propensity score matching was used to minimize confounding because of the differences in demographic and perioperative characteristics. The primary outcome was estimated blood loss (EBL). The secondary outcomes were operative time, postoperative blood transfusion, VTE, surgical site infection, reoperation, readmission, and death. There were 1803 matched pairs in the MIS analysis. In the ABD hysterectomy analysis, 2:1 matching was used with a total of 1168 patients receiving mechanical prophylaxis alone matched to 616 patients receiving dual prophylaxis. EBL was higher by 54.5 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.9-92.1) in those receiving dual prophylaxis in the ABD hysterectomy analysis but did not differ between groups in the MIS analysis. Operative time was significantly longer with dual prophylaxis in both MIS (18.3 minutes; 95% CI, 13.8-22.8) and ABD (15.3 minutes; 95% CI, 9.0-21.6) surgical approaches. There was no difference in other secondary outcomes.
Conclusion:
The addition of pharmacologic prophylaxis to mechanical prophylaxis in benign hysterectomy was associated with longer operative time, regardless of surgical approach and increased EBL in ABD hysterectomy. Given very low rates of VTE, no difference in other perioperative outcomes, and possible harm, it seems reasonable to encourage individualized rather than routine use of pharmacologic prophylaxis in patients undergoing benign hysterectomy receiving mechanical prophylaxis.
More Related Videos
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
05:44Author Spotlight: Utilizing Venoplasty Balloon Model in Rodents to Simulate Surgical Interventions for Deep Veins
Published on: May 24, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Venous Thrombosis I: Introduction
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care