Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Functional Classification of Joints01:09

Functional Classification of Joints

5.2K
Functional Classification of Joints
The functional classification of joints is determined by the amount of mobility between the adjacent bones. Joints are functionally classified as a synarthrosis or immobile joint, an amphiarthrosis or slightly moveable joint, or as a diarthrosis, a freely moveable joint. Fibrous and cartilaginous joints can be functionally classified as either synarthroses  or amphiarthroses, whereas all synovial joints are classified as diarthroses.
Synarthrosis
An...
5.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imaging hidden objects with consumer LiDAR via motion-induced sampling.

Nature·2026
Same author

Reducing Lumbar Extensor Exertion in Lifting Tasks with a Powered Back Exosuit.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2026
Same author

What if eye...? Computationally recreating vision evolution.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Accuracy of a novel mixed reality surgical platform for total knee arthroplasty.

Arthroplasty (London, England)·2025
Same author

Toward personalizing prosthesis prescription: A take-home study of three microprocessor-controlled prosthetic knees: A randomized crossover study.

PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation·2025
Same author

"Comparing the biomechanical response of users of an open-source powered knee and ankle prosthesis versus a passive prosthesis during ramp and stair ambulation".

Journal of biomechanics·2025
Same journal

Scaling contact force parameters across body size, limb count, and number of contact spheres.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

The extrapolated body center of mass predicts subsequent foot placement choice during dynamic single-leg landings.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Lateral reactive stepping responses differ between individuals with and without transfemoral amputation.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Effect of foot orthoses on the biomechanics of stair ascent and descent in chronic metatarsalgia.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Reconstruction of gait variables from 3D foot geometry and sparse plantar pressure landmarks using deep learning.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
Same journal

Characterizing the relationship between isolated extrinsic lower limb muscle activity and Talocrural, Subtalar, and midtarsal joint kinematics under an unweighted condition.

Journal of biomechanics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.8K

Predicting biological joint moment during multiple ambulation tasks.

Jonathan Camargo1, Dean Molinaro1, Aaron Young1

  • 1Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA; Institute for Robotics and Intelligent Machines (IRIM), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Journal of Biomechanics
|March 1, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Wearable sensors combined with machine learning can predict joint moments during movement. This technology offers a non-invasive alternative to motion capture for understanding biological effort and controlling assistive devices.

Keywords:
Biomechanics estimationJoint moment predictionMachine learningSensor-fusion

More Related Videos

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

16.9K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 2, 2025

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion
09:32

Subject-specific Musculoskeletal Model for Studying Bone Strain During Dynamic Motion

Published on: April 11, 2018

9.8K
Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis
08:08

Oscillation and Reaction Board Techniques for Estimating Inertial Properties of a Below-knee Prosthesis

Published on: May 8, 2014

16.9K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.4K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics and Machine Learning
  • Wearable Sensor Technology
  • Human Motion Analysis

Background:

  • Traditional inverse dynamics methods for analyzing biological effort rely on motion capture, which can be cumbersome and restrictive.
  • Wearable sensors offer a promising alternative for unobtrusive and continuous monitoring of human movement.
  • Integrating machine learning with wearable sensor data allows for advanced analysis and prediction of biomechanical parameters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel approach for estimating and predicting joint moments using only wearable sensors.
  • To assess the accuracy of joint moment prediction for multiple ambulation modes at various anticipation times.
  • To compare prediction accuracy across different joints (hip, knee, ankle) and ambulation types.

Main Methods:

  • Combined data from electromyography (EMG), inertial measurement units (IMU), and electrogoniometers.
  • Utilized forward feature selection to identify optimal sensor data features for prediction.
  • Tested the model on level walking, stair ascent/descent, and ramp ambulation.
  • Evaluated prediction accuracy using Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for direct estimation and advance prediction.

Main Results:

  • Wearable sensors accurately estimated joint moments with an MAE of 0.06 ± 0.02 Nm/kg.
  • Predicted joint moments 150 ms in advance with an MAE of 0.10 ± 0.04 Nm/kg (within 9.2% of the joint moment range).
  • Hip moment prediction showed significantly lower error compared to knee and ankle moments (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

  • Wearable sensor-based machine learning models can accurately estimate and predict joint moments during various activities.
  • This approach provides a viable, non-invasive alternative to motion capture for biomechanical analysis.
  • Accurate joint moment prediction has potential applications in user activity monitoring, risk factor reduction, and exoskeleton control.