Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

A Five-Color Multiplex Droplet Digital PCR Assay With Support Vector Regression for Forensic Age Prediction.

Electrophoresis·2026

Same author

Neutralization of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever pseudotyped virions with heavy chain antibodies.

Virologica Sinica·2025

Same author

C-Fos protein expression in the mouse brain: effects of nicotine aerosol.

Toxicology and applied pharmacology·2025

Same author

Licoflavone B Suppresses Influenza A Virus by Targeting the Viral RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase (RdRp).

Viruses·2025

Same author

5-HT<sub>2a</sub>R contributes to pulmonary arterial hypertension by modulating the AHR pathway.

Biochemical pharmacology·2025

Same author

EEG N1 Specialization to Print in Chinese Primary School Students: Developmental Trajectories, Longitudinal Changes, and Individual Differences.

Child development·2025

Same journal

EXPRESS: Age-related Differences in Recognition Memory for Discourse: The Case of Modified Words, Competitors, and Related Lures.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Exaggerated Self-Referencing in Body Dysmorphic Disorder.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

EXPRESS: Post-Error Adjustments: The role of Response Stimulus Intervals and error placement.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

Mitigating the Low Prevalence Effect: Role of Removing Explicit "Target-Absent" Responses in Visual Search.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

Visual Selection Is Spatially Constrained During Working Memory Consolidation.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same journal

Cross-Phoneme Generalisation of Dimension-Based Statistical Learning for Stop Voicing: Probing Subject Design and Word Frame Effects.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Are there associations between daily multitasking experience and multitasking performance?

Kelvin Fh Lui¹, Pu Fan², Ken Hm Yip²

¹Wofoo Joseph Lee Consulting and Counselling Psychology Research Centre, Lingnan University, Tuen Mun, Hong Kong.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006)

|March 3, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Daily multitasking experience did not correlate with laboratory performance in a new study. This suggests that simply engaging in multitasking activities may not improve cognitive performance without intentional practice.

Keywords:

Media multitasking daily multitasking experience multitasking ability multitasking habits multitasking performance

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Measuring the Switch Cost of Smartphone Use While Walking

Published on: April 30, 2020

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

Previous research on multitasking experience and performance yielded inconsistent results.
Measurement limitations, including low reliability of single-item experience measures and simplistic laboratory tasks, hindered understanding.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the relationship between daily multitasking experience and laboratory multitasking performance using an improved research design.
To address prior measurement issues by employing multiple, reliable, and valid assessment methods.

Main Methods:

Utilized a mobile phone task-switching paradigm as a proxy for daily multitasking experience.
Employed three realistic multitasking laboratory paradigms to simulate real-life multitasking scenarios.
Ensured reliability and validity through multiple measurement approaches.

Main Results:

Mobile phone task switching showed no significant association with the media multitasking index, indicating distinct measurement targets.
Multitasking performance indicators from different realistic paradigms exhibited moderate correlations, suggesting shared underlying abilities.
No significant association was found between daily multitasking experience and laboratory multitasking performance indicators.

Conclusions:

Daily multitasking practice may only enhance performance when undertaken with the explicit intention to improve.
Future research should consider the role of intentionality in the multitasking experience-performance relationship.
Findings highlight the complexity of measuring and understanding multitasking behavior and its cognitive underpinnings.