Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Venous access techniques.

E W Nelson

    The Urologic Clinics of North America
    |August 1, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This review covers evolving venous access techniques, including central venous catheters and implantable devices for hemodialysis. It analyzes the pros, cons, and complications of these vascular access methods.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Evolution of trends in the live kidney transplant donor-recipient relationship.

    Transplantation proceedings·2013
    Same author

    Does ultrasonic energy for surgical dissection reduce the incidence of renal transplant lymphocele?

    Transplantation proceedings·2011
    Same author

    Acute postpartum necrosis of the anterior hypophysis.

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2010
    Same author

    Phlebothrombosis and thrombophlebitis in gynecology and obstetrics.

    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2010
    Same author

    Ligation of the vena cava; a critical evaluation based on a study of 22 cases.

    The New Orleans medical and surgical journal·2010
    Same author

    Laparoscopic treatment of post renal transplant lymphoceles.

    Surgical endoscopy·2003
    Same journal

    An Unprecedented Era of Innovation in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Hubert Humphrey's Bladder Cancer: If He Could Have Time Traveled, Would that Have Changed the Outcome?

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Key Clinical Trials Shaping the Future of Superficial High-Risk Bladder Cancer Management.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Future Directions: Artificial Intelligence and Digital Tools in Bladder Cancer Care.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Economic Considerations in the Management of Superficial Bladder Cancer.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    Same journal

    Patient-Centered Approaches to Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Care.

    The Urologic clinics of North America·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Vascular Surgery
    • Nephrology
    • Medical Devices

    Background:

    • Venous access is crucial for various medical treatments, including hemodialysis.
    • Technological advancements have led to diverse venous access methods.
    • Central venous catheters remain a common but not risk-free option.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the evolution of venous access techniques.
    • To analyze different methods for short- and long-term venous access.
    • To discuss the advantages, disadvantages, and complications of vascular access procedures.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review of central venous catheters.
    • Review of totally implantable devices for central venous access.
    • Analysis of current hemodialysis vascular access evolution.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Central venous catheters offer versatile short- and long-term access.
    • Totally implantable devices represent a newer approach to central venous access.
    • Hemodialysis techniques have evolved significantly, impacting vascular access choices.

    Conclusions:

    • Vascular access methods are tailored to patient needs.
    • Understanding the risks and benefits of each technique is essential.
    • Ongoing evolution in venous access aims to improve patient outcomes.