Methodological considerations for implementation of lymphocyte subset analysis in a clinical reference laboratory

As the diagnostic utility of lymphocyte subset analysis has been recognized in the clinical research laboratory, a wide variety of reagents and cell preparation, staining and analysis methods have also been described. Methods that are perfectly suitable for analysis of smaller sample numbers in the biological or clinical research setting are not always appropriate and/or applicable in the setting of a high volume clinical reference laboratory. We describe here some of the specific considerations involved in choosing a method for flow cytometric analysis which minimizes sample preparation and data analysis time while maximizing sample stability, viability, and reproducibility. Monoclonal T- and B-cell reagents from three manufacturers were found to give equivalent results for a reference population of healthy individuals. This was true whether direct or indirect immunofluorescence staining was used and whether cells were prepared by Ficoll-Hypaque fractionation (FH) or by lysis of whole blood. When B cells were enumerated using a polyclonal anti-immunoglobulin reagent, less cytophilic immunoglobulin staining was present after lysis than after FH preparation. However, both preparation methods required additional incubation at 37 degrees C to obtain results concordant with monoclonal B-cell reagents. Standard reagents were chosen on the basis of maximum positive/negative separation and the availability of appropriate negative controls. The effects of collection medium and storage conditions on sample stability and reproducibility of subset analysis were also assessed. Specimens collected in heparin and stored at room temperature in buffered medium gave reproducible results for 3 days after specimen collection, using either FH or lysis as the preparation method. General strategies for instrument optimization, quality control, and biohazard containment are also discussed.