Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2025

04:11
Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Hepatitis B Virus Detection
Published on: December 15, 2023
3.8K
Validation of coding algorithms for identifying people with viral hepatitis using claims data according to different
Ming-Jen Sheu1, Tsung-Wei Chin2, Fang-Ping Ku2
1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.
BMC Infectious Diseases
|March 5, 2022
Summary
This study evaluated coding algorithms for identifying hepatitis B (HBV) and C (HCV) virus infections. The optimal algorithm for both PPV and Sen was "≥2 outpatient or ≥1 inpatient codes".
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Epidemiology
- Medical Coding
Background:
- Claims data analysis is crucial for public health surveillance.
- Accurate identification of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is essential for patient management and disease control.
- Performance of coding algorithms varies significantly based on reference standards and study periods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the performance of various coding algorithms for identifying HBV and HCV infections.
- To compare algorithm performance across different reference standards (RSs) and study periods (SPs).
- To determine the optimal coding algorithm for maximizing both positive predictive value (PPV) and sensitivity (Sen).
Main Methods:
- A proportional random sample of 10,000 patients aged ≥20 years was analyzed.
- Three hierarchical reference standards (RS1, RS2, RS3) and three study periods (4, 8, 12 years) were utilized.
- Six coding algorithms were evaluated using ICD-10-CM codes in Taiwan National Health Insurance claims data (2016-2019).
Main Results:
- The number of confirmed HBV and HCV cases increased with more inclusive reference standards and longer study periods.
- Positive predictive value (PPV) was lowest with RS1 and highest with RS3, increasing with study period length.
- Sensitivity (Sen) was highest with RS2 and a 4-year study period; the algorithm '≥2 outpatient or ≥1 inpatient codes' showed the best overall performance.
Conclusions:
- Different reference standards and study periods significantly impact the estimated PPV and Sen for HBV and HCV identification.
- The coding algorithm '≥2 outpatient or ≥1 inpatient codes' is recommended for optimal identification of individuals with HBV or HCV.
- This finding aids in improving the accuracy of disease surveillance using health insurance claims data.

