Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Unrealistic Optimism Bias01:30

Unrealistic Optimism Bias

14
Unrealistic optimism bias is the tendency to overestimate the likelihood of positive outcomes. This cognitive bias makes individuals believe they are less likely to experience failures, setbacks, or risks and more likely to succeed than others. For example, people may assume they are less prone to health issues, accidents, or financial struggles than their peers, even when they share similar risk factors.One key component of this bias is the above-average effect, where individuals perceive...
14
Bias01:22

Bias

5.7K
Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
5.7K
Self-Serving Bias01:29

Self-Serving Bias

11
Self-serving bias is a cognitive phenomenon in which individuals attribute positive outcomes to internal factors such as their abilities, intelligence, or effort while attributing negative outcomes to external circumstances. This cognitive distortion helps maintain self-esteem but can also impede objective self-assessment.Theoretical Explanations of Self-Serving BiasTwo primary theories explain the self-serving bias: the cognitive explanation and the motivational explanation.The cognitive...
11
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.1K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.1K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

13.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
13.0K
Motivational Bias01:25

Motivational Bias

26
Cognitive bias results from limitations in thinking and information processing, leading to systematic errors in judgment. Conversely, motivational bias stems from personal desires or emotions, causing distortions in perception to align with self-interest. Motivational bias influences how individuals perceive and attribute causes to events, often shaped by personal needs, goals, and self-esteem preservation. This bias can distort judgment, leading to inaccurate assessments of success, failure,...
26

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leveraging nanoparticle protein corona to advance plasma proteome profiling.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Beyond Correlation: Establishing Causality in Protein Corona Formation for Nanomedicine.

Molecular pharmaceutics·2025
Same author

AI-Driven Prediction of Cardio-Oncology Biomarkers Through Protein Corona Analysis.

Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996)·2025
Same author

The probabilistic termination tool amber.

Formal methods in system design·2023
Same author

Scenario-Based Verification of Uncertain MDPs.

Tools and algorithms for the construction and analysis of systems : 26th International Conference, TACAS 2020, held as part of the European Joint Conferences on Theory and Practice of Software, ETAPS 2020, Dublin, Ireland, April 25-30, ...·2020
Same journal

A topological characterization of stabilizing consensus.

Distributed computing·2026
Same journal

Connectivity Labeling in Faulty Colored Graphs.

Distributed computing·2026
Same journal

Optimal message-passing with noisy beeps.

Distributed computing·2025
Same journal

Asymmetric distributed trust.

Distributed computing·2024
Same journal

Near-optimal distributed dominating set in bounded arboricity graphs.

Distributed computing·2024
Same journal

Component stability in low-space massively parallel computation.

Distributed computing·2024
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.7K

Synthesizing optimal bias in randomized self-stabilization.

Matthias Volk1,2, Borzoo Bonakdarpour3, Joost-Pieter Katoen1

  • 1Software Modeling and Verification Group, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

Distributed Computing
|March 7, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a method to find the optimal coin bias for self-stabilizing algorithms, minimizing convergence time. Results show fair coins are best for small networks, while biased coins are optimal for larger ones, with bias increasing with size.

Keywords:
Parameter synthesisPerformanceRandomized distributed systemsSelf-stabilization

More Related Videos

Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs
08:49

Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs

Published on: September 16, 2019

7.8K
WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 1, 2025

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.7K
Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs
08:49

Improving Small RNA-seq: Less Bias and Better Detection of 2'-O-Methyl RNAs

Published on: September 16, 2019

7.8K
WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control
08:18

WheelCon: A Wheel Control-Based Gaming Platform for Studying Human Sensorimotor Control

Published on: August 15, 2020

5.1K

Area of Science:

  • Distributed computing
  • Theoretical computer science
  • Formal methods

Background:

  • Randomization is crucial for self-stabilization in anonymous networks to overcome impossibility results.
  • Optimal coin bias in self-stabilizing algorithms is not well understood, impacting expected convergence time.
  • Existing methods lack automated techniques for determining optimal coin bias.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a technique for automatically synthesizing the optimal coin bias in self-stabilizing algorithms.
  • To minimize the expected convergence time of self-stabilizing protocols.
  • To demonstrate the technique's applicability to Herman's token ring algorithm.

Main Methods:

  • Parameter synthesis approach from probabilistic model checking.
  • Iterative refinement of parameter regions for minimal convergence time.
  • Over- and under-approximation techniques to bound the optimal parameter space.
  • Analysis of algorithm variants and the impact of speed reducers.

Main Results:

  • The developed technique successfully synthesizes optimal coin bias for self-stabilizing algorithms.
  • For Herman's token ring algorithm, a fair coin is optimal for small rings.
  • A biased coin is optimal for larger rings, with the bias growing with ring size.
  • Speed reducers can improve the expected convergence time of Herman's protocol.

Conclusions:

  • Automated synthesis of optimal coin bias is feasible and effective for self-stabilizing systems.
  • The optimal coin bias depends on network size, challenging the assumption of fair coin usage.
  • The proposed technique provides a systematic way to enhance the performance of randomized distributed algorithms.