Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Healthcare Providers' Perceptions and Multi-Level Determinants of Adoption of an AI-Powered Electrocardiography Interpretation Clinical Decision Support System in Ethiopia: A Formative Qualitative Study.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same author

Breaking Diagnostic Barriers: Vision Transformers Redefine Monkeypox Detection.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Vision Transformers for Low-Quality Histopathological Images: A Case Study on Squamous Cell Carcinoma Margin Classification.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Microscale Flow Control and Droplet Generation Using Arduino-Based Pneumatically-Controlled Microfluidic Device.

Biosensors·2024
Same author

Pathological Insights: Enhanced Vision Transformers for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer.

Cancers·2024
Same author

An Alternative Athlete Monitoring System Using Cost-Effective Inertial Sensing Instrumentation.

Journal of electrical engineering & technology·2023
Same journal

RETRACTED: Sabir et al. DNA Based and Stimuli-Responsive Smart Nanocarrier for Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer: Applications and Challenges. <i>Cancers</i> 2021, <i>13</i>, 3396.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Adeluola et al. Chemoprevention of 4-NQO-Induced Oral Cancer by the Combination of Resveratrol and EGCG: In Vivo, In Silico and In Vitro Studies. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 1098.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Peñalver et al. Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up of Patients with Follicular Lymphoma-Spanish Lymphoma Group (GELTAMO) 2026. <i>Cancers</i> 2026, <i>18</i>, 395.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Correction: Accorsi Buttini et al. Development of a Simplified Geriatric Score-4 (SGS-4) to Predict Outcomes After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients Aged over 50. <i>Cancers</i> 2025, <i>17</i>, 3278.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Age-Stratified Long-Term Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Stage IV Melanoma and NSCLC in The Netherlands: A Population-Based Study.

Cancers·2026
Same journal

Targeting Ferroptosis in Glioblastoma: Molecular Mechanisms, Tumor Microenvironment, and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Cancers·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
15:48

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: December 15, 2014

22.7K

Patchless Multi-Stage Transfer Learning for Improved Mammographic Breast Mass Classification.

Gelan Ayana1, Jinhyung Park1, Se-Woon Choe1,2

  • 1Department of Medical IT Convergence Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Gumi 39253, Korea.

Cancers
|March 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel multi-stage transfer learning (TL) method for classifying mammographic breast masses. The approach significantly improves deep learning model performance, reducing the need for large datasets and computational burden in breast cancer diagnosis.

Keywords:
cancer cell lineclassificationmammogrammulti-stage transfer learningpatchless

More Related Videos

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.0K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
15:48

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging

Published on: December 15, 2014

22.7K
Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
07:15

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

7.0K
Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns
13:44

Detection of Architectural Distortion in Prior Mammograms via Analysis of Oriented Patterns

Published on: August 30, 2013

43.1K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Deep learning (DL) shows promise in mammographic breast-mass classification but faces challenges with large datasets and generalization.
  • Existing methods like ImageNet-based transfer learning (TL) and patch classifiers have limitations for standalone DL application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a novel multi-stage TL approach for classifying mammographic breast masses as benign or malignant.
  • To enhance the performance and generalizability of DL models for breast cancer diagnosis.

Main Methods:

  • A multi-stage TL model was developed, pre-trained on ImageNet and cancer cell line images.
  • The model was trained and validated on three public datasets (DDSM, INbreast, MIAS) and a mixed dataset.
  • A patchless approach was employed, contrasting with traditional patch-based methods.

Main Results:

  • Achieved an average five-fold cross-validation AUC of 1, 0.9994, 0.9993, and 0.9998 for DDSM, INbreast, MIAS, and mixed datasets, respectively.
  • Demonstrated statistically significant performance improvement over patch-based methods (p=0.0029).
  • Improved test accuracy by 8% (91.41% vs. 99.34%) on the INbreast dataset compared to patch- and whole image-based methods.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed multi-stage TL method effectively classifies mammographic breast masses with high accuracy.
  • This patchless approach addresses the need for large training datasets and reduces computational load for DL models in breast cancer screening.