Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

07:43
In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
3.2K
Three-Dimensional Functional Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis
Eytan M Debbi1, Fernando J Quevedo González2, Seth A Jerabek1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Adult Reconstruction and Joint Replacement, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
The Journal of Arthroplasty
|March 10, 2022
Summary
Component offset in total hip arthroplasty significantly impacts range of motion and impingement. Acetabular cup and liner offsets most effectively reduce extra-prosthetic impingement, improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic Surgery
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Component offset is a known factor influencing impingement after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
- Traditional radiographic evaluation of offset differs from assessment in functional, impingement-prone positions.
- The precise impact of acetabular and femoral component offsets on range of motion (ROM) requires further quantification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify the effect of acetabular (cup/liner) and femoral (head/stem) offsets on ROM changes.
- To evaluate these effects in two functional positions prone to impingement: 90° flexion/internal rotation and 10° extension/external rotation.
- To determine which component offsets have the greatest impact on extra-prosthetic impingement.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 16 THA patients with pre- and post-operative CT scans.
- Creation of 3D models from CT scans to mitigate metal artifact and accurately represent implant placement.
- Simulation of ±5 mm offsets for acetabular cup, liner, femoral stem, and femoral head to calculate maximum ROM to bone-bone impingement.
Main Results:
- Increased offset generally increased ROM to impingement; decreased offset reduced it.
- In 90° flexion/internal rotation, liner offset had the largest effect on ROM, followed by cup, head, and stem offsets.
- In 10° extension/external rotation, cup offset had the largest effect, followed by liner, head, and stem offsets.
Conclusions:
- Increasing component offset, regardless of the method, can reduce impingement.
- Changes in the center of rotation through acetabular cup or liner offsets exert the most significant influence on extra-prosthetic impingement.

