Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
Published on: February 25, 2020
Optimized outcome prediction of oncogenetic mutations in non-early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Li-Jun Peng1, Si-Si Wang1, Shan-Shan Guo1
1Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Rui Jin Er Road, 200025 Shanghai, China; Pôle de Recherches Sino-Français en Science du Vivant et Génomique, 197 Rui Jin Er Road, 200025 Shanghai, China.
Background:
Early biomarkers allowing effective treatment stratification in adult T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) patients remain elusive.
Materials And Methods:
The mutation spectrum of 116T-ALL adult patients enrolled in the Shanghai Institute of Hematology (SIH)-based hospital network or Multicenter Hematology-Oncology Protocols Evaluation System (M-HOPES) in China were studied by using RNA-sequencing or targeted next generation sequencing. A comprehensive survival analysis based on clinical characteristics, immunophenotype and oncogenetic classifier was performed.
Results:
Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP-ALL) has higher mutation rates of N/K-RAS and lower mutation rates of FBXW7 compared to non-ETP ALL, but the survival probability of ETP-ALL patients is similar to that of non-ETP ALL patients. T-ALLs with a NOTCH1/FBXW7 (N/F) mutation in the absence of RAS or PTEN abnormalities (NFRP class I) show a more favorable outcome compared to T-ALLs with no N/F mutation and/or with the presence of RAS/PTEN alterations (NFRP class II). A survival analysis of T-ALL, taking into account both the ETP-ALL/non-ETP T-ALL groups and the NFRP oncogenetic classifier, demonstrates that, within the non-ETP T-ALL subtype, NFRP class II identifies a group with poor prognosis and significant decreases of both OS (14.8% versus 50.9%, P = 0.019) and EFS (11.4% versus 42.4%, P = 0.001). In contrast, no survival difference is observed within ETP-ALL between the NFRP class I or class II (OS: 37.9% versus 33%, P = 0.876; EFS: 39.8% versus 33.7%, P = 0.969).
Conclusion:
In summary, the oncogenetic classifier based on the NFRP classes is particularly useful to improve the stratification of non-ETP ALL.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Cancer Survival Analysis

