Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Heuristics01:21

Heuristics

158
Heuristics are problem-solving strategies that use mental shortcuts to simplify decision-making. Unlike algorithms, which must be followed precisely to achieve a correct result, heuristics offer a general problem-solving framework. They save time and energy but can sometimes lead to less rational decisions.
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
158
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

21
In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
21
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

45.9K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
45.9K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

36.4K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
36.4K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.6K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.6K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fake publications in biomedical science: red-flagging method indicates mass production.

Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology·2025
Same author

The misalignment of incentives in academic publishing and implications for journal reform.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Is Ockham's razor losing its edge? New perspectives on the principle of model parsimony.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Alternative models of funding curiosity-driven research.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2025
Same author

Uncertainty about paternity: a study on deliberate ignorance.

Frontiers in psychology·2024
Same author

The impact of generative artificial intelligence on socioeconomic inequalities and policy making.

PNAS nexus·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 30, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K

Simple heuristics to run a research group.

Gerd Gigerenzer1

  • 1Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Psych Journal
|March 15, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Establishing a successful research group requires fostering an open culture and implementing specific heuristics. These strategies promote collaboration, trust, and intellectual risk-taking for scientific advancement.

Area of Science:

  • Social Sciences
  • Organizational Psychology
  • Research Management

Background:

  • Increasing trend of interdisciplinary research collaboration.
  • Challenges in establishing and maintaining effective research group environments.
  • Need for practical strategies to foster scientific teamwork.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present heuristic principles for setting up and maintaining a collaborative research group.
  • To share practical strategies for fostering an open and trusting research environment.
  • To outline an "adaptive toolbox" for enhancing research group dynamics.

Main Methods:

  • Case study methodology using personal experience directing a research group.
  • Description of heuristic principles for group setup (topic, culture, proximity).
Keywords:
Max Planck institutesheuristicsleadershipresearch cultureresearch grouptrust

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.1K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 30, 2025

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.5K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.1K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.2K
  • Elaboration of heuristics for maintaining open culture (goals, contrarians, responsibility, writing).

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key principles for research group setup: common topic, interdisciplinary approach, open culture, and spatial/temporal proximity.
    • Detailed heuristics for maintaining an open culture: collective goals, inclusion of diverse perspectives, shared responsibility, and collaborative writing.
    • Demonstrated how these heuristics create a climate of trust, rigorous discussion, and willingness to learn.

    Conclusions:

    • An "adaptive toolbox" of heuristics can shape a research group's intellectual and social climate.
    • Fostering a family-like climate of trust encourages members to take intellectual risks.
    • Successful collaboration, driven by trust and open communication, is essential for scientific progress.