Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025

09:06
Evaluation of the Curing of Adhesive Systems by Rheological and Thermal Testing
Published on: July 3, 2020
7.4K
Effects of C-factor on dentin bonding using various adhesive systems.
1Department of Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice
|March 17, 2022
Summary
The C-factor significantly impacts resin composite bond strength to dentin. Bonding to flat walls is superior to flat floors, while cavity preparations show reduced bond strength irrespective of the adhesive system used.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Adhesive Dentistry
- Biomaterials
Background:
- The C-factor (configuration factor) influences the stress experienced by adhesive interfaces in dental restorations.
- Understanding C-factor effects is crucial for optimizing resin composite bonding to dentin.
- Dentin substrate geometry (wall vs. floor) can affect adhesive bond strength.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of C-factor on the microtensile bond strength of resin composite to different dentin surfaces (floor and wall).
- To compare the performance of three different adhesive systems under varying C-factor conditions.
- To determine how cavity preparation geometry influences bond strength compared to flat surfaces.
Main Methods:
- Four dentin substrate types were prepared: flat wall, flat floor, cavity wall, and cavity floor.
- Human molars were restored using Clearfil SE Bond, Single Bond, or Clearfil tri-S Bond, followed by Z100 resin composite buildup.
- Microtensile bond strength specimens were prepared and tested after light curing.
- Statistical analysis was performed to compare bond strengths across groups.
Main Results:
- All tested adhesive systems demonstrated the highest bond strength to the flat wall dentin group.
- Bond strength to cavity preparations (wall and floor) was significantly lower than to respective flat surfaces.
- No significant difference in bond strength was observed between cavity wall and cavity floor for Clearfil SE Bond and Clearfil tri-S Bond.
Conclusions:
- Dentin C-factor significantly affects resin composite bond strength, irrespective of the adhesive system.
- Bond strength is consistently higher for flat wall dentin compared to flat floor dentin.
- Self-etching systems promote uniform bonding to cavity wall and floor, while total-etch systems may reduce bond strength to the cavity floor.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
266
The bond between aggregate particles and the cement matrix is significantly influenced by the shape and surface texture of the aggregates. High-strength concretes benefit from a rougher texture, which leads to stronger bonding due to greater adhesion. Angular aggregates with larger surface areas also enhance this bond. The bonding quality, however, is complex to assess as no universally accepted test exists. Good bonding is indicated when a crushed concrete specimen shows some aggregate...
266
Strength of Cement
226
Strength tests for cement are not performed directly on neat cement paste due to difficulty in obtaining consistent, reliable specimens. Instead, cement is typically tested in the form of cement-sand mortar.
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
226
Types of Cement I
193
Portland cement comes in several types, each with distinct properties and applications based on their chemical composition and hydration characteristics:
Type I (Ordinary Portland Cement) is widely used for general construction where special properties are not required. It has moderate sulfate resistance and heat of hydration.
Type II (Modified Cement) offers moderate resistance to sulfate attack and a lower rate of heat development compared to Type I. It is suitable for structures in...
Type I (Ordinary Portland Cement) is widely used for general construction where special properties are not required. It has moderate sulfate resistance and heat of hydration.
Type II (Modified Cement) offers moderate resistance to sulfate attack and a lower rate of heat development compared to Type I. It is suitable for structures in...
193
EDTA: Conditional Formation Constant
1.2K
Each EDTA molecule has six binding sites: four carboxyl groups and two amino groups. The fully protonated form of EDTA is represented as H6Y2+. However, it can exist in different forms, H5Y+, H4Y, H3Y−, H2Y2−, and HY3−, depending on the pH of the solution. In very basic solutions with pH > 10.17, the fully deprotonated form, Y4−, is the predominant species that readily complexes with metal ions in a 1:1 ratio.
For the equilibrium reaction of the metal with the...
For the equilibrium reaction of the metal with the...
1.2K

