Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2025
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
An Objective Measure of Decisional Clarity to Assess Decision Aid Effectiveness in Situations with Equipoise: A
1Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Background:
Decision aids can help patients make medical decisions, which is especially advantageous in situations with equipoise. However, when there is no correct answer, it is difficult to assess whether a decision aid is helpful. The goal of this research is to propose and validate an objective method for measuring decision aid effectiveness by quantifying the clarity participants achieved when making decisions.
Design:
The measure of decisional clarity was tested in a convenience sample of 131 college-aged students making hypothetical decisions about 2 treatment options for depression and anxiety. The treatments varied with respect to potential benefits and harms. Information was presented numerically or with an accompanying data visualization (an icon array) that is known to aid decision making.
Results:
Decisional clarity was better with the icon arrays. Furthermore, the results showed that decisional clarity can be used to identify situations for which patients will be more likely to struggle making their decision. These included situations for which financial considerations were relevant to the decision and situations for which the probabilities of potential benefits were higher.
Limitations:
The measure of decisional clarity and the situations identified as lacking clarity should be validated with a larger, more representative sample.
Conclusions:
These findings demonstrate that decisional clarity can be used to both empirically evaluate the effectiveness of a decision aid as well as test factors that can cloud clarity and disrupt medical decision making.
Implications:
Researchers and medical providers interested in developing decision aids for situations with equipoise can use decisional clarity as an objective measure to assess the effectiveness of their decision aid. Financial considerations and higher probabilities may also cloud judgments.
Highlights:
An objective measure of decisional clarity is supported.Decisional clarity can be used to evaluate decision aids in the context of equipoise for which there is no objectively correct choice.Decisional clarity can also be used to identify scenarios for which patients are likely to struggle to make a medical decision.
More Related Videos
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
Related Concept Videos
01:09Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
01:11Blinding
01:14Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
01:09Odds Ratio
01:23Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
01:20Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...