Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is multitasking efficient? Different metrics, different conclusions.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Blindsight and residual vision: How reliable is the redundant target effect as a diagnostic tool?

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

An attempt to replicate action-effect learning and its generalization without stimulus-stimulus learning.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Ten years Diffusion Model for Conflict (DMC) tasks: Theoretical foundations, applications, practical recommendations, and open challenges.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

The role of time in action control: Evidence against anticipation of action-effect intervals and a possible motivational account for delayed-effect costs.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2025
Same author

Fading appetite: Desaturation of food images reduces cravings but not approach biases.

Appetite·2025
Same journal

Associations between movement behaviors, sleep, and screen time exposure in middle childhood using multivariable modelling.

Human movement science·2026
Same journal

The interaction of biomechanical demands and the speed-accuracy trade-off for the control of multi-directional, three-dimensional targeted reaching movements.

Human movement science·2026
Same journal

Think positive, perform better: The detrimental effect of technical motor imagery before action.

Human movement science·2026
Same journal

Shoulder-elbow coordination in the transverse plane during badminton forehand drive depending on training status using vector coding analysis.

Human movement science·2026
Same journal

Delayed reaction time and altered spatial activation of Fibularis longus in chronic ankle instability: A high-density surface electromyography study.

Human movement science·2026
Same journal

Observed teacher-child interaction quality as a predictor of motor competence in preschoolers: A sex-differentiated analysis.

Human movement science·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

22.6K

Resource limitations in bimanual pointing.

Markus Janczyk1, Cosima Schneider2, Constanze Hesse3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Human Movement Science
|March 21, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Coordinated bimanual movements face spatial interference, especially with asymmetric amplitudes. This study reveals that motor programming for these movements shares limited resources, challenging parallel processing assumptions in dual-task models.

Keywords:
Bimanual pointingEffect propagationMotor programmingPRPSpatial interference effect

More Related Videos

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors
15:00

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

3.7K
Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
16:00

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates

Published on: November 11, 2011

22.6K
The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors
15:00

The Impact of Motor Task Conditions on Goal-Directed Arm Reaching Kinematics and Trunk Compensation in Chronic Stroke Survivors

Published on: May 2, 2021

3.7K
Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

1.8K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human motor control

Background:

  • Coordinated bimanual movements are crucial for daily activities but are constrained by temporal and spatial factors.
  • Spatial interference effects arise during asymmetric bimanual movements, with performance costs varying based on stimulus cueing (symbolic vs. direct).
  • Previous research attributed spatial interference to both cognitive (response selection) and motoric (motor programming) processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the motor programming component of bimanual interference operates in parallel or shares capacity-limited resources, as proposed in dual-task models.
  • To determine if motor programming interference can occur independently of other processing stages.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments utilizing the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP) paradigm.
  • Task 1 involved bimanual pointing movements with asymmetric amplitudes.
  • Task 2 required auditory pitch discrimination.

Main Results:

  • The spatial interference effect observed during bimanual pointing was influenced by the task's processing demands.
  • Evidence suggests that the motor programming stage involved in bimanual interference is not independent.
  • Results indicate that motor programming for bimanual movements utilizes capacity-limited resources.

Conclusions:

  • The motor programming contribution to bimanual interference is not fully parallel and interferes with other processing stages.
  • Contrary to dual-task models, motor programming in this context taps into shared, limited cognitive resources.
  • This finding has implications for understanding the architecture of cognitive and motor control during complex movements.