MDCT Findings in Gastrointestinal Perforations and the Predictive Value according to the Site of Perforation

Stefania Romano1, Carmela Somma2, Antonio Sciuto3

  • 1Department of Radiology, "S. Maria delle Grazie" Hospital, 80078 Pozzuoli, Italy.

Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)
|March 22, 2022
PubMed

Insights

Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) aids in identifying gastrointestinal perforations. Specific imaging signs like fat stranding help pinpoint perforation sites, assisting surgeons in treatment planning.

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Surgical Imaging

Background:

  • Gastrointestinal perforations are a common emergency department presentation.
  • Accurate localization is crucial for effective patient management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) findings in gastrointestinal perforations.
  • To analyze the impact of imaging signs on presurgical perforation site identification.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 93 emergency MDCT scans from patients undergoing surgery for GI perforation.
  • Independent review by two radiologists before and after surgical diagnosis.
  • Analysis of findings, including positive predictive values and correspondence analysis.

Main Results:

  • Absence of inframesocolic free air in sigmoid colorectal perforations.
  • Limited supramesocolic free fluid in gastroduodenal perforations.
  • High positive predictive value for perivisceral fat stranding in colonic perforations; upstream loop distension and downstream loop collapse were common.

Conclusions:

  • MDCT findings can provide valuable information for surgical planning, especially in ambiguous cases.
  • Supports surgeons in decision-making, particularly for laparoscopic approaches.

Related Concept Videos

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:28

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

Esophageal perforations manifest in various clinical forms, influenced by factors such as the perforation's cause and location (cervical, intrathoracic, or intra-abdominal), the extent of contamination, and potential injury to adjacent mediastinal structures. The timing between the perforation occurrence and treatment initiation also affects the clinical presentation.
Clinical Manifestations:
165
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction01:22

Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction

Esophageal perforation is a severe medical condition characterized by a breach in the integrity of the esophageal wall. This breach can occur due to various factors such as trauma, medical procedures, or underlying diseases. When the esophageal wall is compromised, it allows food, fluids, and digestive juices into the chest cavity or adjacent structures, leading to potential complications and health risks.
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
195
Inflammatory Bowel Disease I: Ulcerative Colitis01:27

Inflammatory Bowel Disease I: Ulcerative Colitis

Introduction
Inflammatory bowel disease, or IBD, encompasses a group of disorders characterized by chronic inflammation or ulceration of the gastrointestinal tract.
Risk Factors
The exact cause of IBD remains unclear, although it is believed to be due to a mix of genetic, environmental, microbial, and immune factors. Genetic factors are significant in determining susceptibility to IBD, with family history being a critical risk factor. Individuals with a first-degree relative who has IBD are at...
386
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies01:28

Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) presents with diverse symptoms depending on the location and severity of the ulcer. Clinical manifestations of peptic ulcer include dull pain and a burning sensation in the mid-epigastric region.
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
219