Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

At-Risk Butterfly Captive Propagation Programs to Enhance Life History Knowledge and Effective Ex Situ Conservation Techniques
Published on: February 11, 2020
Towards evidence-based conservation of subterranean ecosystems
Stefano Mammola1,2, Melissa B Meierhofer3, Paulo A V Borges4
1Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History (LUOMUS), University of Helsinki, Pohjoinen Rautatiekatu 13, Helsinki, 00100, Finland.
Subterranean ecosystems need better conservation. A review found limited evidence for intervention effectiveness, highlighting a need for more quantitative research and standardized reporting to protect cave biodiversity.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Conservation Biology
- Biodiversity Science
Background:
- Subterranean ecosystems are vast yet understudied, facing unique conservation challenges.
- International Years of Caves and Karst (2021-2022) aimed to raise awareness of these critical environments.
- Despite their importance, subterranean ecosystems are often overlooked in global conservation efforts.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantitatively assess the evidence base for conservation interventions in subterranean ecosystems globally.
- To identify research gaps and progress in subterranean ecology and management.
- To inform more effective and evidence-based conservation strategies for subterranean biota.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review of 708 peer-reviewed and grey literature publications (1964-2021).
- Analysis of 1,954 conservation interventions across terrestrial, freshwater, and saltwater subterranean systems.
- Quantification of statistically tested intervention effectiveness and research biases.
Main Results:
- A significant increase in studies since the 2000s, but a decrease in quantifying intervention impact.
- Only 31% of conservation interventions had their effectiveness statistically tested.
- Research is concentrated in the Palearctic and Nearctic regions, biased towards indirect measures, arthropods, bats, and terrestrial caves.
Conclusions:
- Most subterranean conservation science lacks rigorous quantitative approaches, leading to sparse evidence of intervention effectiveness.
- There's a critical need to increase statistical testing and standardize reporting for meta-analysis.
- Developing a database of interventions can guide cost-effective and impactful conservation for subterranean species and habitats.
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Small Populations
Conservation of Declining Populations
Habitat Fragmentation
What is Conservation Biology?
Threats to Biodiversity
The Evidence for Evolution

