Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy01:18

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

6.5K
Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
6.5K
Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology01:28

Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

374
Three-dimensional imaging techniques are essential in cell biology, allowing researchers to visualize intricate cellular structures with high resolution. Two prominent methods, Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy (DIC) and Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM), provide distinct advantages for imaging live and thick specimens, respectively.Differential Interference Contrast MicroscopyDIC microscopy enhances contrast in transparent, unstained samples by converting phase...
374
Two-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology01:29

Two-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

598
Two-dimensional (2D) microscopy encompasses a range of optical techniques that capture images within a single focal plane, offering detailed representations of microscopic structures. These techniques are essential in biological and medical research, enabling the visualization of cellular and subcellular structures with different levels of contrast and specificity.There are several major types of 2D microscopy, each with strengths and applications.Bright-Field MicroscopyBright-field microscopy...
598
Overview of Microscopy Techniques01:22

Overview of Microscopy Techniques

13.5K
The early pioneers of microscopy opened a window into the invisible world of microorganisms. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes that leveraged nonvisible light, such as fluorescence microscopy that uses an ultraviolet light source and electron microscopy that uses short-wavelength electron beams. These advances significantly improved magnification, image resolution, and contrast. By comparison, the...
13.5K
Overview of Electron Microscopy01:25

Overview of Electron Microscopy

11.6K
The wavelengths of visible light ultimately limit the maximum theoretical resolution of images created by light microscopes. Most light microscopes can only magnify 1000X, and a few can magnify up to 1500X. Electrons, like electromagnetic radiation, can behave like waves, but with wavelengths of 0.005 nm, they produce significantly greater resolution up to 0.05 nm as compared to 500 nm for visible light. An electron microscope (EM) can create a sharp image that is magnified up to 2,000,000X.
11.6K
Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy01:37

Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

8.3K
Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy (SRFM) provides a better resolution than conventional fluorescence microscopy by reducing the point spread function (PSF). PSF is the light intensity distribution from a point that causes it to appear blurred. Due to PSF, each fluorescing point appears bigger than its actual size, and it is the PSF interference of nearby fluorophores that causes the blurred image. Various approaches to achieving higher resolution through SRFM have recently been...
8.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

OpticalFlow3D - a tool for measuring amorphous motion in three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy images.

Journal of cell science·2026
Same author

Myo1e/f regulate phagocytic podosomes to promote efficient cup closure in macrophages.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Compartmentalized cytoplasmic tradewinds direct soluble proteins.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Better reporting is better science: Community-defined minimal reporting requirements for light microscopy.

The Journal of cell biology·2026
Same author

Mechanically-induced Septin Networks Protect Nuclear Integrity.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Redefining colocalization analysis with a novel phasor mixing coefficient.

Journal of cell science·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Quantitative Optical Microscopy: Measurement of Cellular Biophysical Features with a Standard Optical Microscope
14:09

Quantitative Optical Microscopy: Measurement of Cellular Biophysical Features with a Standard Optical Microscope

Published on: April 7, 2014

15.7K

When light meets biology - how the specimen affects quantitative microscopy.

Michael A Reiche1, Jesse S Aaron1, Ulrike Boehm1

  • 1Advanced Imaging Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA 20147, USA.

Journal of Cell Science
|March 23, 2022
PubMed
Summary

Biological samples significantly impact fluorescence microscopy data. Understanding sample-specific issues like quenching and scattering is crucial for accurate bioimaging and data interpretation.

Keywords:
Biological artifactsCell biologyOptical microscopyQuantitative microscopy

More Related Videos

Light-Induced In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy for Observation of the Liquid-Soft Matter Interaction
05:33

Light-Induced In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy for Observation of the Liquid-Soft Matter Interaction

Published on: July 26, 2022

2.3K
Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy
12:51

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy

Published on: December 9, 2013

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Quantitative Optical Microscopy: Measurement of Cellular Biophysical Features with a Standard Optical Microscope
14:09

Quantitative Optical Microscopy: Measurement of Cellular Biophysical Features with a Standard Optical Microscope

Published on: April 7, 2014

15.7K
Light-Induced In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy for Observation of the Liquid-Soft Matter Interaction
05:33

Light-Induced In Situ Transmission Electron Microscopy for Observation of the Liquid-Soft Matter Interaction

Published on: July 26, 2022

2.3K
Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy
12:51

Simultaneous Multicolor Imaging of Biological Structures with Fluorescence Photoactivation Localization Microscopy

Published on: December 9, 2013

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Life Sciences
  • Microscopy
  • Biophotonics

Background:

  • Fluorescence microscopy is a powerful tool in biological research.
  • Quantitative microscopy data can be significantly affected by sample properties.
  • Commonly discussed issues include photobleaching and autofluorescence.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a holistic discussion of sample-related issues in fluorescence microscopy.
  • To guide life scientists in understanding and managing bioimaging subtleties.
  • To highlight how biological samples can skew quantification and interpretation of microscopy data.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on sample-induced artifacts in microscopy.
  • Analysis of the interplay between light and biological samples.
  • Discussion of less-routine topics such as quenching, scattering, and biological anisotropy.

Main Results:

  • Sample properties like quenching, scattering, and anisotropy can cause experimental pitfalls.
  • These factors can lead to unanticipated errors in quantitative microscopy.
  • Some discrepancies can be minimized, while others require pragmatic interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • Fluorescence microscopy images are not perfect representations of biology.
  • Experimenters must consider sample-specific factors for accurate data interpretation.
  • Managing potential pitfalls is essential for reliable bioimaging conclusions.