Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Published on: September 13, 2015
Leg Dominance Does Not Influence Maximal Force, Force Steadiness, or Motor Unit Discharge Characteristics
Ivana Petrovic, Ioannis G Amiridis1, Ales Holobar2
1Laboratory of Neuromechanics, Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences at Serres, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, GREECE.
Purpose:
The aim of our study was to compare maximal force, force steadiness, and discharge characteristics of motor units in tibialis anterior during contractions with the dorsiflexors of the dominant and nondominant legs at low-to-moderate target forces and three ankle angles.
Methods:
Twenty young adults performed maximal and submaximal isometric contractions (5%, 10%, 20%, 40%, and 60% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC)) with the dorsiflexors of the dominant and nondominant legs at three ankle angles (75°, short length; 90°, intermediate length; 105°, long length). High-density EMG signals from the tibialis anterior muscle of each leg were recorded.
Results:
Maximal force (average dominant, 182.9 ± 64.5 N; nondominant, 179.0 ± 58.8 N) and the fluctuations in force, quantified as absolute (SD) and normalized amplitudes (coefficient of variation (CoV)), were similar between the two legs across the three ankle angles (average CoV for dominant, 1.5% ± 1.0%; nondominant, 1.7% ± 1.3%). The CoV for force for both legs decreased from 5% to 20% MVC force, and then it plateaued at 40% and 60% MVC force. EMG amplitude, mean discharge rate of motor units, discharge variability (interspike interval), and the variability in neural drive (filtered cumulative spike train) were similar between the two legs across the submaximal contractions.
Conclusions:
MVC force and force steadiness were similar across ankle angles and target forces between the dominant and nondominant legs. The attributes that underlie the self-reported identification of a dominant leg were not associated with the force capacity or the control of force for the dorsiflexor muscles, at least during isometric contractions.
Related Concept Videos
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Motor Units
Motor units come in different sizes, with smaller units...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions
Isotonic contractions
Isotonic contractions occur when a muscle changes length while...

