Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
Published on: April 4, 2025
A Neural Algorithm for the Detection and Correction of Anomalies: Application to the Landing of an Airplane
Angel Mur1, Louise Travé-Massuyès1, Elodie Chanthery1
1LAAS-CNRS, Université de Toulouse, 7 Av. du Colonel Roche, 31400 Toulouse, France.
Abstract:
The location of the plane is key during the landing operation. A set of sensors provides data to get the best estimation of plane localization. However, data can contain anomalies. To guarantee correct behavior of the sensors, anomalies must be detected. Then, either the faulty sensor is isolated or the detected anomaly is filtered. This article presents a new neural algorithm for the detection and correction of anomalies named NADCA. This algorithm uses a compact deep learning prediction model and has been evaluated using real and simulated anomalies in real landing signals. NADCA detects and corrects both fast-changing and slow-moving anomalies; it is robust regardless of the degree of oscillation of the signals and sensors with abnormal behavior do not need to be isolated. NADCA can detect and correct anomalies in real time regardless of sensor accuracy. Likewise, NADCA can deal with simultaneous anomalies in different sensors and avoid possible problems of coupling between signals. From a technical point of view, NADCA uses a new prediction method and a new approach to obtain a smoothed signal in real time. NADCA has been developed to detect and correct anomalies during the landing of an airplane, hence improving the information presented to the pilot. Nevertheless, NADCA is a general-purpose algorithm that could be useful in other contexts. NADCA evaluation has given an average F-score value of 0.97 for anomaly detection and an average root mean square error (RMSE) value of 2.10 for anomaly correction.
More Related Videos
06:45Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator
Published on: October 28, 2022
08:04Fully Automated Leg Tracking in Freely Moving Insects using Feature Learning Leg Segmentation and Tracking FLLIT
Published on: April 23, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Root-Locus Method
This system can be represented by a block...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Errors in Global Positioning System
Plotting and Calibrating the Root Locus
The maximum gain occurs at the breakaway points between open-loop poles on the real axis, while the minimum gain is...