Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2025
A Multimodal Imaging- and Stimulation-based Method of Evaluating Connectivity-related Brain Excitability in Patients with Epilepsy
Published on: November 13, 2016
SEEG Functional Connectivity Measures to Identify Epileptogenic Zones: Stability, Medication Influence, and Recording
Danika L Paulo1, Kristin E Wills1, Graham W Johnson1
1From the Departments of Neurological Surgery (D.L.P., K.E.W., R.P.N., V.L.M., S.N., D.J.E.), Radiology and Radiological Sciences (V.L.M., D.J.E.), Biostatistics (V.L.M., S.W.R., D.J.E.), and Neurology (H.K.), Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science (K.E.W., G.W.J., H.F.J.G., V.L.M., S.N., D.J.E.); Vanderbilt Institute for Surgery and Engineering (K.E.W., G.W.J., H.F.J.G., V.L.M., S.N., D.J.E.); Department of Biomedical Engineering (G.W.J., H.F.J.G., V.L.M., S.W.R., S.N., D.J.E.), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN; Departments of Neurosurgery and Biomedical Engineering (J.D.R.), University of Utah, Salt Lake City; and Department of Pediatrics (S.B.R.), Vanderbilt Children's Hospital, Nashville, TN.
Background And Objectives:
Functional connectivity (FC) measures can be used to differentiate epileptogenic zones (EZs) from non-EZs in patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Little work has been done to evaluate the stability of stereo-EEG (SEEG) FC measures over time and their relationship with antiseizure medication (ASM) use, a critical confounder in epilepsy FC studies. We aimed to answer the following questions: Are SEEG FC measures stable over time? Are they influenced by ASMs? Are they affected by patient data collection state?
Methods:
In 32 patients with medically refractory focal epilepsy, we collected a single 2-minute prospective SEEG resting-state (awake, eyes closed) data set and consecutive 2-minute retrospective pseudo-rest (awake, eyes open) data sets for days 1-7 postimplantation. ASM dosages were recorded for days 1-7 postimplantation and drug load score (DLS) per day was calculated to standardize and compare across patients. FC was evaluated using directed and nondirected measures. Standard clinical interpretation of ictal SEEG was used to classify brain regions as EZs and non-EZs.
Results:
Over 7 days, presumed EZs consistently had higher FC than non-EZs when using between imaginary coherence (ImCoh) and partial directed coherence (PDC) inward strength, without accounting for DLS. These measures were demonstrated to be stable over a short-term period of 3 consecutive days with the same DLS. Between ImCoh FC differences between EZs and non-EZs were reduced with DLS decreases, whereas other measures were not affected by DLS. FC differences between EZs and non-EZs were seen during both resting-state and pseudo-rest conditions; ImCoh values were strongly correlated between the 2 conditions, whereas PDC values were not.
Discussion:
Inward and nondirected SEEG FC is higher in presumed EZs vs non-EZs and measures are stable over time. However, certain measures may be affected by ASM dose, as between ImCoh differences between EZs and non-EZs are less pronounced with lower doses, and other measures such as PDC are poorly correlated across recording conditions. These findings allow novel insight into how SEEG FC measures may aid surgical localization and how they are influenced by ASMs and other factors.
More Related Videos
05:54Stereo-Electro-Encephalo-Graphy SEEG With Robotic Assistance in the Presurgical Evaluation of Medical Refractory Epilepsy: A Technical Note
Published on: June 13, 2016
09:00Investigating the Function of Deep Cortical and Subcortical Structures Using Stereotactic Electroencephalography: Lessons from the Anterior Cingulate Cortex
Published on: April 15, 2015
