Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Interest in Robotics Outpaces Access: Results from a Survey of Practicing Plastic Surgeons.

Journal of reconstructive microsurgery·2026
Same author

Antidepressants and postoperative complications in breast reduction surgery: A retrospective association study.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Threading the Needle: Targeted Therapies in the Perioperative Period.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Impact of internal mammary lymph node biopsy during microsurgical breast reconstruction on multidisciplinary breast cancer management decisions.

Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS·2026
Same author

Use of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists is Associated with an Increased Rate of Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty.

Research square·2026
Same author

Corepam: a 24-gene PAM50-derived expression score with cross-platform external validation for breast cancer prognosis.

Breast cancer research : BCR·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

3.0K

A Novel Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale.

Eliana F R Duraes1, Paul Durand1, Megan Morisada1

  • 1From the Cleveland Clinic; and the University of Brasilia.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|March 29, 2022
PubMed
Summary

A new Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale offers reliable evaluation of breast reconstruction outcomes. This tool aids objective assessment, improving patient quality of life by aligning surgeon and patient expectations.

More Related Videos

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

6.7K
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema
05:44

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema

Published on: January 12, 2017

10.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction
13:35

Endoscopic Bilateral Nipple-sparing Mastectomy via a Single Axillary Incision with Immediate Pre-pectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction

Published on: May 17, 2024

3.0K
Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
06:03

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis

Published on: February 6, 2020

6.7K
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema
05:44

Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Breast Cancer-related Lymphedema

Published on: January 12, 2017

10.2K

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery
  • Aesthetic Evaluation

Background:

  • Patient quality of life after breast reconstruction is significantly impacted by aesthetic outcomes.
  • Discrepancies frequently arise between patient and surgeon evaluations of aesthetic results.
  • A validated, objective tool is needed to assess breast aesthetics independently.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a comprehensive scale for evaluating breast aesthetics post-reconstruction.
  • To establish a reliable method for aesthetic outcome assessment independent of patient or surgeon bias.

Main Methods:

  • Development of the 13-item Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale, designed for layperson understanding.
  • Internal consistency testing using a six-member panel grading postoperative photographs.
  • Interrater and intrarater reliability testing with four physicians evaluating abdominally based reconstructions.

Main Results:

  • The scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach alpha = 0.926).
  • High reliability and reproducibility were observed with a four-member panel (coefficient alpha = 0.957).
  • Individual grader reliability ranged from 0.688 to 0.9, indicating consistent performance.

Conclusions:

  • The Validated Breast Aesthetic Scale effectively assesses various aspects of breast reconstruction aesthetics with high internal consistency.
  • Panel-based grading using postoperative photographs enhances reliability and reproducibility compared to single-grader assessments.
  • The scale provides an objective measure to improve aesthetic outcome evaluations in breast reconstruction.