Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Preparation and Using Phantom Lesions to Practice Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies
Published on: September 29, 2009
How to identify predatory journals in a search: Precautions for nurses.
Marilyn H Oermann1, Leslie H Nicoll, Heather Carter-Templeton
1Marilyn H. Oermann is the Thelma M. Ingles professor of nursing at Duke University School of Nursing and the editor-in-chief of Nurse Educator and Journal of Nursing Care Quality . Leslie H. Nicoll is the editor-in-chief of CIN: Computers, Informatics Nursing and Nurse Author & Editor and the president and owner of Maine Desk LLC. Heather Carter-Templeton is the chairperson of the Adult Health Department and an associate professor at West Virginia University. Jacqueline K. Owens is a professor of nursing at Ashland University Schar College of Nursing and Health Sciences and the editor-in-chief of OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing . Jordan Wrigley is a data librarian at the Center for Research Data and Digital Scholarship, University of Colorado Boulder Libraries. Leila S. Ledbetter is a research and education librarian at Duke University Medical Center Library. Peggy L. Chinn is the editor-in-chief of Advances in Nursing Science and a professor emerita at the University of Connecticut School of Nursing.
Nurses must learn to identify predatory journals to ensure they access reliable information on new nursing practices and patient care approaches. This guide helps nurses evaluate sources and distinguish legitimate journals from predatory ones.
Area of Science:
- Nursing
- Scholarly Communication
- Information Literacy
Background:
- Nursing journals are vital for disseminating new care practices.
- The rise of predatory journals threatens the integrity of scholarly information.
- Nurses need skills to navigate the publication landscape.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide guidance for nurses on evaluating information sources.
- To equip nurses with methods for distinguishing predatory from legitimate journals.
- To promote due diligence in academic publishing for nurses.
Main Methods:
- Review of common predatory publishing tactics.
- Development of criteria for assessing journal legitimacy.
- Guidance on critical appraisal of published nursing research.
Main Results:
- Predatory journals often exhibit deceptive practices.
- Legitimate journals adhere to established academic publishing standards.
- Nurses can develop skills to identify trustworthy sources.
Conclusions:
- Empowering nurses with critical appraisal skills is essential.
- Distinguishing predatory journals protects nursing knowledge.
- Due diligence ensures the reliability of evidence-based nursing practice.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II
Communication between nurses and...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities I
The legal responsibilities of a nurse regarding informed consent include the following:
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Nursing Ethical Principles I
Autonomy
Autonomy underscores the significance of a patient's self-determination and freedom from external control. In healthcare, respecting...

