Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

07:28
Identification of Functionally-Relevant Lentivirus Integration Sites in an Insertional Mutagenesis Cell Library
Published on: January 10, 2025
383
Sampling strategy, characteristics and representativeness of the InGef research database.
M Ludwig1, D Enders1, F Basedow1
1InGef - Institute for Applied Health Research Berlin GmbH [Institut für angewandte Gesundheitsforschung Berlin GmbH], Germany.
Public Health
|April 4, 2022
Summary
The German InGef sample database accurately represents the German population in terms of demographics, hospitalization, and mortality rates, making it a valuable resource for health research.
Area of Science:
- Health services research
- Epidemiology
- Biostatistics
Background:
- The German InGef research database provides longitudinal claims data for approximately 8.8 million individuals.
- Establishing the representativeness of healthcare databases is crucial for reliable epidemiological studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To detail the sampling strategy for the InGef sample database.
- To assess the characteristics and external validity of a representative sample of 4 million individuals from the InGef database.
- To compare the sample database with national reference data for validation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study utilizing anonymized claims data from 2019.
- A sample of 4 million individuals was drawn from the InGef database, aiming for representativeness in age, sex, and region.
- Analysis included demographic data, hospitalization rates, mortality rates, and drug prescription rates, compared against national statistics.
Main Results:
- The InGef sample closely mirrored the German population in sex distribution (50.8% vs 50.7% women) and mean age (44.1 vs 43.9 years).
- A slightly lower proportion of individuals from eastern Germany were in the sample (16.5% vs 19.5%).
- Hospitalization and mortality rates showed good agreement with national data; prescription rates for top drug classes were marginally higher.
Conclusions:
- The InGef sample database demonstrates strong overall concordance with the German population.
- The database is a valid and representative resource for studying morbidity, mortality, and drug usage in Germany.
- Findings support the utility of the InGef sample database for health research and policy.
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Sampling Method
11.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
11.3K
Contaminants and Errors
156
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
156
Sampling Plans
305
Sampling is a crucial step in analytical chemistry, allowing researchers to collect representative data from a large population. Common sampling methods include random, judgmental, systematic, stratified, and cluster sampling.
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
305
Stratified Sampling Method
13.1K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
13.1K
Convenience Sampling Method
9.8K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population.
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
9.8K
Group Design
9.8K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.8K

