Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Forced-exposure trials increase suboptimal choice
Margaret A McDevitt1, Jeffrey M Pisklak2, Roger M Dunn3
1Department of Psychology, McDaniel College, 2 College Hill, Westminster, MD, 21157, USA. mmcdevit@mcdaniel.edu.
Abstract:
The influence of single option or forced-exposure (FE) trials was studied in the suboptimal choice task. Pigeons chose between an optimal alternative that led to food half of the time and a suboptimal alternative that led to food 20% of the time. Choice of the suboptimal alternative was compared across groups of subjects that received different numbers of FE trials during training. In Experiment 1, subjects received 100% FE trials, 67% FE trials, or only choice trials. Pigeons in the two groups that had FE trials developed extreme preference for the signaled suboptimal alternative over the unsignaled optimal alternative, while pigeons that had no FE trials showed pronounced individual differences. Experiment 2 compared 10% and 90% FE trials. When neither alternative signaled trial outcomes, both groups of subjects strongly preferred the optimal alternative. When the suboptimal alternative provided differential signals, the subjects in the 90% FE group developed strong preference for the suboptimal alternative and subjects in the 10% FE group maintained preference for the optimal alternative. The results of both experiments demonstrate that FE trials can have substantial effects on the development of preference in the suboptimal choice task.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The Availability Heuristic
Framing Effects
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Blinding
Milgram's Obedience to Authority

