Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.0K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

186
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
186
Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

13.2K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
13.2K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

278
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
278
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

3.8K
Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
3.8K
Blinding01:11

Blinding

3.3K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hypertension and Postoperative Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Anesthesiology research and practice·2026
Same author

Measurement properties of the interest in health scale among community-dwelling older adults in Japan: Verification of the 12-item, 6-item, and 4-item versions of the interest in health scale.

Preventive medicine reports·2026
Same author

Continuous glucose monitoring-derived time in range is associated with changes in arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2026
Same author

Balloon-occluded Alternative Infusion of Fragmented Gelatin Particles of TACE for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Refractory to Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab.

Anticancer research·2026
Same author

Mid-treatment MRI-based tumor volume reduction rate as a continuous prognostic factor after chemoradiation for cervical cancer: development and two-center internal-external validation.

Journal of radiation research·2026
Same author

Response to "Reconsidering 'photon-ineligible' status in concurrent chemo-proton therapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer".

Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K

Using horseshoe prior for incorporating multiple historical control data in randomized controlled trials.

Tomohiro Ohigashi1,2, Kazushi Maruo3, Takashi Sozu4

  • 1Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, 13121University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|April 5, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a novel horseshoe prior method for integrating multiple historical controls in clinical trials. The approach enhances statistical power and reduces uncertainty, especially with few heterogeneous controls.

Keywords:
Bayesian methodsClinical trialshorseshoe priormeta-analytic approachmultiple historical controlspower prior

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

746
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.7K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

746
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

4.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Historical controls are crucial for modern clinical trials, often integrated using meta-analytic methods or power priors.
  • Existing methods may face challenges with heterogeneity among historical control groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a new statistical method for incorporating multiple historical controls in randomized controlled trials.
  • To evaluate the performance of this method, particularly when historical controls exhibit heterogeneity.

Main Methods:

  • A novel approach using a horseshoe prior, a type of global-local shrinkage prior, to incorporate multiple historical controls.
  • The method accommodates scenarios where historical controls share the same distribution as the current control, or where a few are heterogeneous and potentially biased.
  • Analysis of two clinical trial examples (binary and time-to-event endpoints) and simulation studies.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method decreased the posterior standard deviation of the treatment effect by accounting for bias between current and heterogeneous historical controls.
  • Statistical power was higher with the proposed method compared to existing methods when current and historical controls followed the same distribution.
  • The method demonstrated advantages when few or no heterogeneous historical controls were anticipated.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed horseshoe prior method offers an effective way to incorporate multiple historical controls in clinical trial analysis.
  • This approach improves statistical efficiency and precision, particularly in situations with limited or heterogeneous historical data.
  • The method is advantageous for trial designs anticipating few or no heterogeneous historical controls.