Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2025

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Cost-effectiveness in diagnosis of stable angina patients: a decision-analytical modelling approach
Muhummad Sohaib Nazir1, Yael Rodriguez-Guadarrama2,3, Tiago Rua4,3
1Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK sohaib.nazir@kcl.ac.uk.
Insights
For stable angina patients, combining SPECT or CMR with CTCA and invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve (ICA-FFR) is most cost-effective for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). ICA-FFR alone becomes cost-effective at higher thresholds.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Health Economics
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) diagnosis in stable angina requires accurate and cost-effective strategies.
- Published diagnostic accuracies vary, necessitating a comparative economic evaluation.
- Invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR) serves as a gold standard for assessing significant CAD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the most cost-effective diagnostic strategy for significant CAD in stable angina patients.
- To compare 17 different diagnostic pathways, including various imaging modalities and invasive procedures.
- To establish cost-effectiveness thresholds for different diagnostic approaches.
Main Methods:
- A probabilistic decision-analytical model was developed for a cohort of stable angina patients.
- Seventeen diagnostic strategies were evaluated, ranging from no testing to combinations of CT coronary angiography (CTCA), stress echocardiography, CT-FFR, SPECT, CMR, PET, ICA, and ICA-FFR.
- Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated as the additional cost per correct diagnosis.
Main Results:
- SPECT followed by CTCA and ICA-FFR is the most cost-effective strategy for cost-effectiveness thresholds (CET) of £1000-£3000 per correct diagnosis.
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) followed by CTCA and ICA-FFR is cost-effective within CETs of £3000-£17,000.
- ICA-FFR as a first-line test becomes the most cost-effective strategy when CET exceeds £24,000.
Conclusions:
- Functional imaging as a first-line strategy is cost-effective for patients with low to intermediate CAD risk and low to intermediate cost-effectiveness thresholds.
- While ICA alone is not cost-effective, ICA-FFR can be cost-effective, particularly in patients with a high pre-test probability of CAD.
- The optimal diagnostic strategy for CAD in stable angina is dependent on the available budget and patient risk profile.
Objective:
Given recent data on published diagnostic accuracies, this study sought to determine the most cost-effective diagnostic strategy for detection of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) in stable angina patients using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional flow reserve (FFR) as the reference standard.
Methods:
A probabilistic decision-analytical model was developed which modelled a cohort of patients with stable angina. We investigated 17 diagnostic strategies between standalone and combination of different imaging tests to establish a correct diagnosis of CAD, using no testing as the baseline reference. These tests included CT coronary angiography (CTCA), stress echocardiography, CT-based FFR, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), positron emission tomography, ICA, and ICA with FFR. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated as the additional cost per correct diagnosis.
Results:
SPECT followed by CTCA and ICA-FFR is the most cost-effective strategy between a cost-effectiveness threshold (CET) value of £1000-£3000 per correct diagnosis. CMR followed by CTCA and ICA-FFR is cost-effective within a CET range of £3000-£17 000 per correct diagnosis. CMR and ICA-FFR is cost-effective within a CET range of £17 000-£24 000. ICA-FFR as first line is the most-cost effective if the CET value exceeds the £24 000 per correct diagnosis. Sensitivity analysis showed that direct ICA-FFR may be cost-effective in patients with a high pre-test probability of CAD.
Conclusion:
First-line testing with functional imaging is cost-effective at low to intermediate value of correct diagnosis in patients with low to intermediate risk of CAD. ICA is not cost effective although ICA-FFR may be at higher CET.
More Related Videos
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina IV: Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT