Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Halo Effect

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The mind's average: Unseen, internally generated ensemble representations can guide visual attention.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same author

'Not so intuitive' physics: Orientation supersedes stability in prioritizing attention.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Same author

Rapid development of inhibitory effects in response to novel features: It's mostly target-feature enhancement.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025

Same author

Examining visual prior entry of semantic affective valences: positive is biased over negative.

Cognition & emotion·2025

Same author

Selectively attended information is obligatorily encoded into visual working memory.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025

Same author

The fate of visual working memory items after their job is done.

Journal of vision·2025

Same journal

A Field Experiment Testing Whether Accountability Reduces Racial Gaps in Performance Evaluations.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Does Testosterone Affect Cognitive Reflection? Evidence From a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of 1,000 Participants.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026

Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Eliminating the Low-Prevalence Effect in Visual Search With a Remarkably Simple Strategy.

J Eric T Taylor^1,2, Matthew D Hilchey³, Blaire J Weidler⁴

¹Vector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Psychological Science

|April 6, 2022

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

A new cognitive strategy significantly reduced the low-prevalence effect in visual search, where rare targets are often missed. This similarity search method proved effective in improving detection accuracy for infrequent items.

Keywords:

low-prevalence effect visual attention visual search

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Visual Perception
Human Factors

Background:

The low-prevalence effect describes the disproportionately high rate of missed rare targets in visual search.
This phenomenon has significant implications for public safety and health, yet interventions have been challenging.
Existing visual search tasks typically instruct participants to find a target's presence or absence.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate a novel cognitive strategy for reducing the low-prevalence effect in visual search.
To determine if a 'similarity search' approach can mitigate the missed detection of rare targets.
To assess the effectiveness of this strategy across multiple experimental trials.

Main Methods:

Three experiments were conducted with adult participants (N=41, 40, 44).
Participants performed visual search tasks under two conditions: standard search instructions and a novel 'similarity search' instruction.
Similarity search required participants to identify the most similar item to a target on each trial, irrespective of target presence.

Main Results:

Strong low-prevalence effects were observed when participants followed standard search instructions.
Under identical visual conditions, the low-prevalence effect was not detected when participants employed the similarity search strategy.
This reduction in the low-prevalence effect was consistently observed across all three experiments.

Conclusions:

A simple, untrained cognitive strategy ('similarity search') can dramatically reduce the low-prevalence effect in visual search.
This finding offers a promising, low-cost intervention for improving detection accuracy in critical safety and health applications.
The results highlight the importance of task instructions in shaping visual search performance and mitigating common search errors.