Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bone Cells and Tissue01:30

Bone Cells and Tissue

5.9K
Bones contain a relatively small number of cells entrenched in a matrix of organic and inorganic components. Although bone cells compose only a small amount of the bone volume, they are crucial to its function. Four types of cells are found within the bone tissue— osteoblasts, osteocytes, osteogenic cells, and osteoclasts.
Osteoblasts and Osteocytes
The osteoblast is the bone cell responsible for forming new bone tissue. It is found in the growing portions of bone, including the...
5.9K
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling01:31

Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling

3.3K
Osteoclasts are cells responsible for bone resorption and remodeling. They originate from hematopoietic progenitor cells present in the bone marrow. Numerous progenitor cells fuse to form multinucleated cells, each with 10-20 nuclei. A single osteoclast has a diameter of 150 to 200 µM. These cells have ruffled borders that break down the underlying bone tissue and release minerals such as calcium into the blood in bone resorption. Osteoclasts cling to bones with their ruffled edges during...
3.3K
Bone Remodeling01:40

Bone Remodeling

38.6K
Bone remodeling is a continuous and balanced process of bone resorption by osteoclasts and bone formation by osteoblasts. In adults, it helps maintain bone mass and calcium homeostasis. While mechanical stress can stimulate turnover as part of the normal maintenance and reparative process, several hormones also regulate bone remodeling.
38.6K
Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification01:29

Bone Formation by Intramembranous Ossification

8.1K
Intramembranous ossification is one of the two processes involved in the development of bones within an embryo. The flat bones of the face, most of the cranial bones, and the clavicles are formed via this process. During intramembranous ossification, the bones develop directly from sheets of undifferentiated mesenchymal connective tissue.
The process begins when mesenchymal cells in the embryonic skeleton gather together and differentiate into osteogenic cells, which then develop into ...
8.1K
Bone Formation by Endochondral Ossification01:24

Bone Formation by Endochondral Ossification

6.0K
Bone formation, or ossification, begins around the sixth to seventh week of embryonic development. Most bones develop from a cartilaginous template through the process of endochondral ossification. Cartilage formation begins when clusters of mesenchymal cells differentiate into chondrocytes. These chondrocytes proliferate rapidly and secrete an extracellular matrix that becomes encased in a membrane called the perichondrium. The resulting cartilage model provides a template that resembles the...
6.0K
Spongy Bone01:09

Spongy Bone

5.7K
All bones comprise an outer layer of compact bone, and an interior made up of spongy bone tissue, also called cancellous or trabecular bone. In long bones, spongy bone tissue is mainly found in the interior of the epiphyses (broad ends of the bone).
Spongy bone is more porous, and less dense compared to compact bone. It is composed of concentric lamellae that are arranged irregularly to form the trabecular network. In some bones, the spaces between trabeculae contain red marrow, where...
5.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Three-dimensional motion analysis of a total wrist prosthesis during the dart-throwing motion: a cadaveric study.

Medical engineering & physics·2026
Same author

Correction: Age-related reduction of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 impairs T cell responses.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Daytime assessment of attention and orientation is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with delirium: A prospective observational study.

General hospital psychiatry·2026
Same author

From Bone to Body: Qualitative Evaluation of Collagenous Tissues Using JFRL Staining in Normal and Pathological Conditions.

Microscopy and microanalysis : the official journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada·2026
Same author

Age-related reduction of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 impairs T cell responses.

Frontiers in immunology·2026
Same author

Single-dose intrapalatal injection of erythromycin-loaded microparticles mitigates periodontitis-induced alveolar bone loss and enhances bone regeneration.

International journal of pharmaceutics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect
09:35

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect

Published on: September 11, 2015

9.8K

Osteoclast formation from mouse bone marrow cells on micro/nano-scale patterned surfaces.

Tsukasa Akasaka1, Hiroshi Hayashi2, Miho Tamai3

  • 1Department of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-8586, Japan.

Journal of Oral Biosciences
|April 10, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study explored how the shape and chemical properties of microscopic patterns on surfaces affect the formation of osteoclasts from bone marrow cells. Osteoclasts are cells that break down bone tissue, and their activity is important for bone health and implant integration. The researchers created surfaces with different patterns using a technique called nanoimprinting. They found that certain patterns—specifically pillars with diameters of 1 micrometer or 500 nanometers and a height of 500 nanometers—promoted osteoclast formation, especially when the surfaces were hydrophobic. In contrast, smaller nanopillars with a diameter of 100 nanometers and height of 200 nanometers reduced osteoclast formation. The study also showed that the type of bone marrow cell used influenced the results. These findings could help in designing dental or bone replacement materials that control the balance between bone formation and resorption.

Keywords:
Bone marrow cellsMicro/nanoscale patternsOsteoclast formationPillarOsteoclast formationSurface topographyBone marrow cell differentiationDental implant materialsNanopatterned surfaces

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Osteoclast Derivation from Mouse Bone Marrow
06:17

Osteoclast Derivation from Mouse Bone Marrow

Published on: November 6, 2014

24.4K
Improved Methodology for Studying Postnatal Osteogenesis via Intramembranous Ossification in a Murine Bone Marrow Injury Model
05:10

Improved Methodology for Studying Postnatal Osteogenesis via Intramembranous Ossification in a Murine Bone Marrow Injury Model

Published on: February 7, 2025

482

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect
09:35

Distinctive Capillary Action by Micro-channels in Bone-like Templates can Enhance Recruitment of Cells for Restoration of Large Bony Defect

Published on: September 11, 2015

9.8K
Osteoclast Derivation from Mouse Bone Marrow
06:17

Osteoclast Derivation from Mouse Bone Marrow

Published on: November 6, 2014

24.4K
Improved Methodology for Studying Postnatal Osteogenesis via Intramembranous Ossification in a Murine Bone Marrow Injury Model
05:10

Improved Methodology for Studying Postnatal Osteogenesis via Intramembranous Ossification in a Murine Bone Marrow Injury Model

Published on: February 7, 2025

482

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials in regenerative medicine
  • Cellular response to surface topography
  • Osteoclast biology in bone remodeling

Background:

Osteoclasts are known to interact with material surfaces, but the specific topographic features that influence their formation remain unclear. Previous studies have explored how surface roughness and chemistry affect cell behavior, yet the role of micro/nanopatterns in osteoclastogenesis has not been fully resolved. Researchers have observed that osteoclasts respond to surface cues, but the exact parameters that drive this response are still debated. It was already known that surface wettability influences cell adhesion and differentiation, but its impact on osteoclast formation is less understood. No prior work had resolved how pattern geometry and hydrophobicity jointly affect osteoclast precursor behavior. This gap motivated the current investigation into how specific micro/nanostructures influence osteoclast formation from bone marrow cells. The study aimed to clarify how patterned surfaces can be engineered to control osteoclast activity. These findings could inform the design of dental or bone replacement materials with tailored surface properties.

Purpose Of The Study:

The study aimed to determine how micro/nanoscale surface patterns influence osteoclast formation from bone marrow-derived cells. Researchers focused on identifying structural parameters—such as shape, size, height, and wettability—that promote or inhibit osteoclastogenesis. They also sought to assess whether the type of osteoclast precursor cells affects the response to patterned surfaces. The motivation stemmed from the need to develop biomaterials with controlled osteoclast activity for clinical applications. By manipulating surface topography, the researchers hoped to create materials that could regulate bone resorption and formation. The study addressed a gap in understanding how surface features interact with osteoclast precursors. The goal was to provide a framework for designing implant surfaces that balance osteoblast and osteoclast activity. This could lead to improved dental or orthopedic implants with better integration and function.

Main Methods:

The researchers used nanoimprinting to fabricate cyclo-olefin polymer (COP) surfaces with defined micro/nanoscale patterns. They varied the shape, size, and height of the patterns to test their effects on osteoclastogenesis. The wettability of the surfaces was also modified to assess its role in cell behavior. Bone marrow cells were cultured on these patterned surfaces in vitro to monitor osteoclast formation. The study included pillars with diameters of 1 μm, 500 nm, and 100 nm, and heights of 500 nm and 200 nm. The surfaces were either hydrophobic or hydrophilic to evaluate their impact on osteoclastogenesis. The researchers observed and quantified osteoclast formation using standard cell culture and staining techniques. The results were analyzed to determine which pattern features most effectively promoted or inhibited osteoclast formation.

Main Results:

Osteoclast formation was significantly enhanced on pillars with diameters of 1 μm and 500 nm and a height of 500 nm. The most pronounced effect was observed on hydrophobic pillars of these dimensions. In contrast, nanopillars with a diameter of 100 nm and height of 200 nm suppressed osteoclastogenesis. The study found that surface wettability played a critical role, with hydrophobic surfaces promoting better osteoclast formation than hydrophilic ones. The results suggest that both pattern geometry and surface chemistry influence osteoclast precursor behavior. The observed differences were not uniform across all cell types, indicating that precursor cell type also affects the outcome. The highest osteoclast formation was recorded on 1 μm diameter hydrophobic pillars. These findings provide a basis for designing implant surfaces that can regulate osteoclast activity.

Conclusions:

The study demonstrated that micro/nanoscale patterns can influence osteoclast formation from bone marrow cells. Specifically, pillars with diameters of 1 μm and 500 nm and a height of 500 nm promoted osteoclastogenesis. Hydrophobic surfaces were more effective than hydrophilic ones in supporting osteoclast formation. The results suggest that surface topography and wettability are key factors in osteoclast precursor behavior. The study also showed that the type of osteoclast precursor cells affects the response to patterned surfaces. These findings could guide the development of biomaterials with controlled osteoclast activity. The authors propose that engineered surfaces can help balance osteoblast and osteoclast functions in implant applications. The study highlights the potential of using patterned surfaces to regulate bone remodeling processes.

Osteoclast formation was promoted on hydrophobic pillars with diameters of 1 μm and 500 nm and height of 500 nm.

The surfaces were fabricated as either hydrophobic or hydrophilic to test their effect on osteoclastogenesis.

Osteoclast formation was decreased on nanopillars with a diameter of 100 nm and height of 200 nm compared to larger pillars.

The study found that the response to patterned surfaces varied depending on the type of osteoclast precursor cells used.

Pillars with a height of 500 nm were more effective in promoting osteoclast formation than those with a height of 200 nm.

The study suggests that engineered surfaces with specific patterns and wettability can regulate osteoclast activity for better implant integration.