Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Hierarchy of Motor Control01:18

Hierarchy of Motor Control

3.8K
The hierarchy of motor control refers to the different levels of organization and processing involved in controlling movement in the body. These levels range from higher cortical areas involved in planning and decision-making to lower spinal cord reflexes that respond automatically to external stimuli.
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

EEG-Controlled Exoskeleton for Walking and Standing: A Longitudinal Multimodal Dataset of Healthy Individuals.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of EEG, fMRI, and fNIRS Studies on the Psychological Impact of Nature on Well-Being.

International journal of environmental research and public health·2026
Same author

Tracking the fate of organophosphate esters: from occurrence to risk in the lower Yangtze River water.

Environmental science and pollution research international·2026
Same author

WearGait-PD: An Open-Access Wearables Dataset for Gait in Parkinson's Disease and Age-Matched Controls.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

The state of science convergence in implantable brain-computer interface clinical trials.

Journal of neural engineering·2025
Same author

Deep Learning-Based Stride Segmentation With Wearable Sensors: Effects of Data Quantity, Sensor Location, and Task.

IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics·2025
Same journal

Semantic Explanation for Malaria Diagnosis: Comparing Human and Machine Generated Annotations for <i>Plasmodium</i> Species and Life-Stage Features.

IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

An Improved Beta Burst Extraction for Chip-Based Deep Brain Stimulation With Real-Time Model Updating.

IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation: A Brief Review of Architectures, Circuits, and Application Challenges.

IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

An Intra-Body Power Transfer System via Localized Capacitive Coupling.

IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Shared and Individual Resting-State MEG Network Signatures of Tinnitus Revealed by Holistic Graph Learning.

IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Stain Consistency Learning: Handling Stain Variation for Automatic Digital Pathology Segmentation.

IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
11:16

Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis

Published on: July 22, 2014

16.4K

A Roadmap Towards Standards for Neurally Controlled End Effectors.

Andrew Y Paek1, Justin A Brantley1,2, Akshay Sujatha Ravindran1

  • 1University of Houston Houston TX 77204 USA.

IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology
|April 11, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standardizing brain-machine interface (BMI) end effectors is crucial for seamless control of devices like prosthetics. This report identifies gaps in current standards for BMI end effectors, proposing a roadmap for future development.

Keywords:
Brain-machine interfaceexoskeletonsprostheticsroboticsstandards

More Related Videos

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.7K
A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

9.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis
11:16

Engineering Platform and Experimental Protocol for Design and Evaluation of a Neurally-controlled Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis

Published on: July 22, 2014

16.4K
Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface
11:54

Real-Time Proxy-Control of Re-Parameterized Peripheral Signals using a Close-Loop Interface

Published on: May 8, 2021

4.7K
A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study
06:58

A Structured Rehabilitation Protocol for Improved Multifunctional Prosthetic Control: A Case Study

Published on: November 6, 2015

9.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neuroscience
  • Rehabilitation Technology

Background:

  • Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) enable control of external devices using neural signals.
  • Current BMI systems lack standardized end-effector interfaces, hindering interoperability.
  • Research aims for seamless "plug and play" functionality between BMIs and diverse end effectors.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and address standardization gaps for end effectors in brain-machine interfacing (BMI).
  • To propose a roadmap for standardizing end effectors used with BMI systems.
  • To evaluate existing device standards for applicability to BMI end effectors.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of outcomes from an IEEE Standards Association working group on End Effectors for Brain-Machine Interfacing.
  • Review of current device standards relevant to end-effector components.
  • Identification of gaps in terminology, data protocols, and safety standards.

Main Results:

  • Existing standards cover basic electrical and mechanical safety for end effectors.
  • Significant gaps identified in unified terminology and data communication protocols.
  • Patient safety and risk mitigation standards require further development for BMI applications.

Conclusions:

  • Standardization of BMI end effectors is essential for reliable and consistent device performance.
  • Addressing identified gaps will facilitate the development of more integrated and user-friendly BMI systems.
  • A clear roadmap is needed to guide the development of comprehensive standards for BMI end effectors.