Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Real-world Safety and Performance of the Symani Surgical System® in Microsurgical Reconstructive Procedures: Primary Results from the PRIMO Study.

Annals of surgery·2026
Same author

[The Evolution of Orthoplastic Surgery: Interdisciplinary Collaboration as the Key to Limb Salvage].

Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie, plastische Chirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Handchirurgie : Organ der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Mikrochirurgie der Peripheren Nerven und Gefasse : Organ der V...·2026
Same author

Does Paying the Same Sustain Telehealth? A Systematic Review of Payment Parity Laws.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Ethical Decision-Making in Medical Practice: The Role of Moral and Business Philosophies.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Neo-Dermis Formation and Graft Timing After ADM Reconstruction: A Cohort Study with Histological Validation.

Journal of functional biomaterials·2025
Same author

Scenario-Based Ethical Reasoning Among Healthcare Trainees and Practitioners: Evidence from Dental and Medical Cohorts in Romania.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Porcine As a Training Module for Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction
07:43

Porcine As a Training Module for Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction

Published on: September 29, 2018

7.8K

Experimental swine models for perforator flap dissection in reconstructive microsurgery.

Alexandru Nistor1, Lucian P Jiga2, Gratian D Miclaus3

  • 1Division of Microsurgery, Pius Branzeu Center for Laparoscopic Surgery and Microsurgery, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Timisoara, Romania.

Plos One
|April 11, 2022
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces five living pig models for perforator flap harvesting training. These models offer a safe and effective method for surgeons to develop essential microsurgical skills for reconstructive procedures.

More Related Videos

A Reliable Porcine Fascio-Cutaneous Flap Model for Vascularized Composite Allografts Bioengineering Studies
05:34

A Reliable Porcine Fascio-Cutaneous Flap Model for Vascularized Composite Allografts Bioengineering Studies

Published on: March 31, 2022

2.5K
A Pre-clinical Rat Model for the Study of Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Reconstructive Microsurgery
08:05

A Pre-clinical Rat Model for the Study of Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Reconstructive Microsurgery

Published on: November 8, 2019

7.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Porcine As a Training Module for Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction
07:43

Porcine As a Training Module for Head and Neck Microvascular Reconstruction

Published on: September 29, 2018

7.8K
A Reliable Porcine Fascio-Cutaneous Flap Model for Vascularized Composite Allografts Bioengineering Studies
05:34

A Reliable Porcine Fascio-Cutaneous Flap Model for Vascularized Composite Allografts Bioengineering Studies

Published on: March 31, 2022

2.5K
A Pre-clinical Rat Model for the Study of Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Reconstructive Microsurgery
08:05

A Pre-clinical Rat Model for the Study of Ischemia-reperfusion Injury in Reconstructive Microsurgery

Published on: November 8, 2019

7.5K

Area of Science:

  • Microsurgery
  • Surgical Education
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Perforator flaps are increasingly popular in reconstructive surgery.
  • Acquiring microsurgical skills for perforator flap harvesting is challenging with traditional training methods.
  • Existing animal models do not adequately simulate human perforator dissection.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate five standardized perforator flap models in living pigs for surgical training.
  • To provide a hands-on learning tool for microsurgical skills in perforator flap harvesting.
  • To compare porcine flap anatomy and dissection parameters with human counterparts.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized CT angiography to map vascular anatomy in ten living pigs.
  • Employed microsurgical techniques to harvest five distinct perforator flaps.
  • Standardized the harvesting process with an operator-assistant team over seven weeks.
  • Assessed flap survival by measuring perforator pulsation post-harvesting.

Main Results:

  • Successfully standardized five perforator flaps based on specific arteries (e.g., deep cranial epigastric, thoracodorsal).
  • Porcine perforator and pedicle sizes closely matched human anatomical measurements.
  • Demonstrated a significant learning curve, with harvesting time decreasing by 44.4% and pulsation time increasing by 275% by the sixth animal.
  • Identified common errors and provided guidance for training on these models.

Conclusions:

  • The five pig perforator flap models serve as an efficient and safe training tool for microsurgical skills.
  • These models provide a realistic hands-on dissection experience comparable to human tissue.
  • The models facilitate the development of perforator flap harvesting expertise, addressing limitations of current training methods.