Search research articles

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Innovative Clinical Trial Approach for Evaluating Digital Medical Devices Under European Fast-Track Regulatory Frameworks.

Statistics in medicine·2026

Same author

Evaluation of performance measures in predictive artificial intelligence models to support medical decisions: overview and guidance.

The Lancet. Digital health·2025

Same author

Causal Inference Methods for Combining Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: A Review.

Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics·2025

Same author

Advancing science- and evidence-based AI policy.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2025

Same author

Mask of Truth: Model Sensitivity to Unexpected Regions of Medical Images.

Journal of imaging informatics in medicine·2025

Same author

Confidence intervals for performance estimates in brain MRI segmentation.

Medical image analysis·2025

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

Machine learning for medical imaging: methodological failures and recommendations for the future.

Gaël Varoquaux^1,2,3, Veronika Cheplygina⁴

¹INRIA, Versailles, France. gael.varoquaux@inria.fr.

NPJ Digital Medicine

|April 13, 2022

Summary

Computer analysis of medical images shows promise, but faces challenges like data bias and publication pressures. This review identifies roadblocks and suggests future solutions for the field.

More Related Videos

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model

Published on: August 16, 2020

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Published on: October 10, 2018

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Constructing and Visualizing Models using Mime-based Machine-learning Framework

Published on: July 22, 2025

Area of Science:

Medical imaging analysis
Artificial intelligence in healthcare
Computational pathology

Background:

Computer analysis of medical images offers significant potential for enhancing patient healthcare outcomes.
The field's progress is impeded by systematic challenges, including data limitations and research incentives.
Biases in data and evaluation methods can hinder the development and reliable assessment of AI tools.

Purpose of the Study:

To review the key roadblocks hindering the development and assessment of computer-aided medical image analysis methods.
To identify potential sources of bias throughout the research and development pipeline.
To discuss current efforts and propose future recommendations for addressing these challenges.

Main Methods:

Literature review of existing research on medical image analysis.
Analysis of data limitations and potential biases in the field.
Examination of research incentives and their impact on progress.

Main Results:

Systematic challenges, including data biases and publication-driven research, slow down progress in medical image analysis.
Potential biases can be introduced at multiple stages of method development and assessment.
Ongoing initiatives are actively working to mitigate these identified problems.

Conclusions:

Addressing biases in data and research practices is crucial for advancing computer analysis of medical images.
Future research should focus on robust evaluation methodologies and transparent reporting.
Collaborative efforts are needed to overcome existing roadblocks and realize the full potential of AI in medical imaging.