Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

16
The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
16
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.3K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.3K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

5.6K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Presumptive steroid-responsive radiculoneuritis in dogs.

Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2026
Same author

Multicenter Prospective Evidence of Kidney Safety of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs for Prevention of Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis.

Gastroenterology·2026
Same author

A population-based, regression discontinuity analysis examined the effects of nationwide alerting for acute kidney injury on health care and patient outcomes.

Kidney international·2026
Same author

Initiatives to enhance referral patterns from primary care to specialist kidney care:a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMJ public health·2025
Same author

Using Human-Centered Design and Development to Create a Digital Sick Day Medication Guidance Application for People With Diabetes, Cardiovascular Disease, or Chronic Kidney Disease: Mixed Methods Study.

JMIR formative research·2025
Same author

AI-Derived Splenic Response in Cardiac PET Predicts Mortality: A Multi-Site Study.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K

External validation of the CRAX2MACE model.

Waseem Hijazi1, Willam Leslie2, Neil Filipchuk1

  • 1Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, GAA08, 3230 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 2T9, Canada.

Journal of Nuclear Cardiology : Official Publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
|April 14, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The CRAX2MACE score accurately predicts 2-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) risk in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). This score outperforms quantitative perfusion measures in external validation studies.

Keywords:
MPIRisk stratificationSPECTmyocardial perfusion imaging

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

929
A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome
08:27

A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome

Published on: May 22, 2019

6.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 27, 2025

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.0K
Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education
09:00

Author Spotlight: Validation of SICOLE-R for Assessing Cognitive and Reading Skills in Spanish-Speaking Children and Its Role in Personalized Education

Published on: August 16, 2024

929
A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome
08:27

A Non-random Mouse Model for Pharmacological Reactivation of Mecp2 on the Inactive X Chromosome

Published on: May 22, 2019

6.5K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging is a standard tool for assessing cardiovascular risk.
  • Accurate prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) is crucial for guiding patient management in suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To externally validate the predictive performance of the CRAX2MACE score for 2-year MACE.
  • To compare the CRAX2MACE score's accuracy against quantitative perfusion metrics derived from SPECT.

Main Methods:

  • A cohort of 2,985 patients undergoing clinically indicated SPECT with MACE follow-up was analyzed.
  • The CRAX2MACE score's prediction for 2-year MACE was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).
  • Calibration was assessed using calibration plots, Brier score, and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

Main Results:

  • The CRAX2MACE score demonstrated a significantly higher AUC (0.710) for predicting 2-year MACE compared to stress TPD (0.669) and ischemic TPD (0.664).
  • The model showed acceptable goodness-of-fit (P = .103) and good calibration (Brier score = 0.071).

Conclusions:

  • The CRAX2MACE score offers superior predictive performance for 2-year MACE compared to quantitative perfusion measures in an independent patient cohort.
  • The CRAX2MACE score is a simple tool that can aid physicians in cardiovascular risk stratification.