Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2025

All-electronic Nanosecond-resolved Scanning Tunneling Microscopy: Facilitating the Investigation of Single Dopant Charge Dynamics
Published on: January 19, 2018
Doping effects on the antibonding states and carriers of two-dimensional PC6
Mi Zhong1, Wei Zeng2, Han Qin3
1School of Physical Science and Technology, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031, People's Republic of China. qijunliu@home.swjtu.edu.cn.
Abstract:
The absence of a bandgap in pristine graphene severely restricts its application, and there is high demand for other novel two-dimensional (2D) materials. PC6 has recently emerged as a promising 2D material with a direct band gap and ultrahigh carrier mobility. In light of the remarkable properties of an intrinsic PC6 monolayer, it would be intriguing to find out whether a doped PC6 monolayer displays properties superior to the pure system. In this study, we have performed density functional theory calculations to understand the doping effects of both P-site and C-site substitution in PC6 and, for the first time, we discovered doping-related impurity-level anomalies in this system. We successfully explained why no donor or acceptor defect states exist in the band structures of XP-PC6 (X = C, Ge, Sn, O, S, Se, or Te). In group-IV-substituted systems, these dopant states hybridize with host states near the Fermi level rather than act as acceptors, which is deemed to be a potential way to tune the mobility of PC6. In the case of group-VI substitution, the underlying mechanism relating to doping anomalies arises from excess electrons occupying antibonding states.
Related Concept Videos
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Aromatic and Antiaromatic Compounds
π Electron Effects on Chemical Shift: Overview
Molecular Orbital Theory II
Valence Bond Theory
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

