Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Reporting of Events Related to Transvaginal Mesh: Understanding the

Kai Dallas1, Colby P Souders1, Ashley Caron1

  • 1From the Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.

Abstract

Insights

Reports to the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database concerning vaginal mesh show potential bias. Manufacturers and attorneys dominate reporting, and many reports are later modified, impacting device safety assessments.

Area of Science:

  • Medical device safety surveillance
  • Regulatory science
  • Biomedical informatics

Background:

  • The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database collects adverse event reports for medical devices.
  • Vaginal mesh implants have been associated with significant patient complications.
  • Assessing the completeness and potential bias in MAUDE reports is crucial for understanding device safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate potential reporting bias in the MAUDE database concerning synthetic transvaginal mesh devices.
  • To analyze the types of reporters and the nature of complaints submitted to MAUDE.
  • To determine the frequency of report modifications after initial submission.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive review of 40,266 safety reports submitted to MAUDE for synthetic transvaginal mesh from 2000-2017.
  • In-depth analysis of a random 2% sample (900 reports) to identify reporter type and complaint details.
  • Examination of report modifications within four years of submission.

Main Results:

  • Sling reports constituted 70.7% of all identified vaginal mesh reports.
  • Manufacturers (46%) and attorneys (41%) were the primary reporters, with healthcare providers (10%) and patients (2%) submitting fewer reports.
  • 18.6% of reviewed reports were modified at least once after their initial submission.

Conclusions:

  • The MAUDE database, while valuable, may present a biased view of vaginal mesh safety due to dominant reporting by manufacturers and attorneys.
  • The frequency of report modifications suggests potential data variability.
  • MAUDE data should not be the sole basis for assessing device safety, as it lacks information on complication-free procedures.