Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Nanofabrication of Gate-defined GaAs/AlGaAs Lateral Quantum Dots
Published on: November 1, 2013
Error rate reduction of single-qubit gates via noise-aware decomposition into native gates
Thomas J Maldonado1,2, Johannes Flick3, Stefan Krastanov4,5
1Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA. maldonado@princeton.edu.
Abstract:
In the current era of Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) technology, the practical use of quantum computers remains inhibited by our inability to aptly decouple qubits from their environment to mitigate computational errors. In this paper, we introduce an approach by which knowledge of a qubit's initial quantum state and the standard parameters describing its decoherence can be leveraged to mitigate the noise present during the execution of a single-qubit gate. We benchmark our protocol using cloud-based access to IBM quantum processors. On ibmq_rome, we demonstrate a reduction of the single-qubit error rate by 38%, from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text], provided the initial state of the input qubit is known. On ibmq_bogota, we prove that our protocol will never decrease gate fidelity, provided the system's [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] times have not drifted above 100 times their assumed values. The protocol can be used to reduce quantum state preparation errors, as well as to improve the fidelity of quantum circuits for which some knowledge of the qubits' intermediate states can be inferred. This paper presents a pathway to using information about noise levels and quantum state distributions to significantly reduce error rates associated with quantum gates via optimized decomposition into native hardware gates.
Related Concept Videos
Block Diagram Reduction
The first step in this process is the identification and relocation of a branch point. A branch point, where a...
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

