Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2025

A High-Throughput Multiplexed Screening for Type 1 Diabetes, Celiac Diseases, and COVID-19
Published on: July 5, 2022
Selecting a target population for type 2 diabetes lifestyle prevention programs: A cost-effectiveness perspective
Joohyun Park1, Ping Zhang1, Hui Shao2
1Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Lifestyle change programs for type 2 diabetes prevention are most cost-effective for high-risk individuals. The in-person group format is optimal for many, while the individual format suits the highest risk groups.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Health Economics
- Preventive Medicine
Background:
- Lifestyle change programs (LCPs) are crucial for preventing type 2 diabetes (T2D).
- The cost-effectiveness (CE) of LCPs varies significantly based on participant T2D risk.
- Understanding optimal program delivery formats is essential for maximizing public health impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the T2D risk thresholds for cost-effective LCP delivery across different formats.
- To compare the CE of individual (in-person, digital) and group (in-person) LCP formats.
- To guide decision-making in targeting populations for T2D prevention interventions.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the CDC-RTI T2D CE Simulation model for analysis.
- Simulated nationally representative populations based on NHANES data (2011-2016).
- Calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained over 25 years from a healthcare system perspective.
Main Results:
- An annual T2D incidence of ≥5% was required for in-person individual programs to be cost-effective ($50,000/QALY).
- Digital individual programs required ≥4% incidence, and in-person group programs required ≥3% incidence.
- In-person group programs dominated digital individual programs for risks ≥4%; individual programs were superior only for risks ≥8%.
Conclusions:
- Targeting LCPs based on individual T2D risk significantly impacts cost-effectiveness.
- In-person group programs offer broad cost-effectiveness for T2D prevention.
- Specific risk stratification is key for optimizing resource allocation in T2D prevention.
Related Concept Videos
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Levels of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention
In primary prevention, actions taken before disease onset prevent the disease from...
Diabetes: Management and Pharmacotherapy
Insulin remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with type 1 and many...
Carbohydrate Metabolism
Starch accounts for approximately 60% of the carbohydrates consumed by humans. Since amylase enzymes cannot function in the stomach's acidic environment, starch can only be digested in the mouth and small intestine. Simple sugars are found naturally in milk and fruits in...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...

