Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2025

E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Representativeness of trial participants: linking the EORTC boost-no boost trial to the Netherlands cancer registry
Anouk Neven1, Marissa C van Maaren2, Kay Schreuder3
1European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium; Luxembourg Institute of Health, Competence Center for Methodology and Statistics, Strassen, Luxembourg.
Background And Objectives:
To evaluate the representativeness of Dutch patients participating in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer EORTC boost-no-boost trial to the target breast cancer patient population.
Methods:
All female breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1989 and 1996, aged ≤70 years, treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) and linked to the EORTC trial database. Baseline characteristics were compared between trial and non-trial participants, for the Dutch population and according to seven participating institutions. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression were used to explore potential heterogeneity in overall survival between low, medium and high-volume institutes.
Results:
Overall, 20,880 patients were identified from the NCR: 2,445 of 2,602 (94%) trial participants could be linked, and 18,435 were treated outside the trial. Trial participants had similar age, morphology, topography, laterality and socioeconomic status as non-trial participants, but more often stage I (62.7% vs. 56.4%) tumours and less often adjuvant treatment (22.9% vs. 26.5%). Crude 20-year survival ranged from 52.5% to 57.4%, without significant differences in multivariable analyses.
Conclusion:
This case study showed that participants in the boost-no-boost trial well represented the Dutch target population. Data linkage comes with challenges, but can close the gap between research and clinical practice.
More Related Videos
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Cancer Survival Analysis
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...