Related Experiment Videos
Development of the FOCUS tool to guide prioritization of clinical guideline recommendations for shared
Clara Orduhan1, Leon V Schewe2, Lena Fischer1
1Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Rüdersdorf, Germany; Center for Health Services Research, Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Rüdersdorf, Germany.
Introduction:
While clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide general recommendations, their application to individual patients requires consideration of differences in preferences, values, and practical circumstances. Shared decision-making (SDM) can help bridge this gap. To better integrate SDM into CPGs, this study aimed to develop a pragmatic tool to support CPG developers in identifying and prioritizing recommendations for which SDM may be particularly relevant.
Methods:
The development of our tool, FOCUS (Facilitating priOritization of CPG recommendations to sUpport Shared decision-making), comprised two steps: (1) generating an initial version within the project core team, informed by a scoping review, an interview study, and a modified Delphi study; and (2) refining this version through two iterative testing rounds with an international multidisciplinary group of experts and patient partners, each consisting of a survey followed by a group discussion.
Results:
A total of 12 participants from eight countries contributed to the testing and refinement of FOCUS. The final tool comprises five items: (1) multiple options with different benefit-harm profiles, (2) decision with impact, (3) potential discrepancy in values and preferences, (4) treatment burden and financial aspects, and (5) uncertainty of evidence. Across items, participants rated FOCUS with a mean of 3.38 or higher (on a scale ranging from 1 to 5) in terms of understandability, applicability, and usefulness for determining SDM relevance. FOCUS is intended to be applied at the recommendation level within the CPG development process. Patient representatives and healthcare professionals rate each item on a 5-point Likert scale, and a weighted mean score is then calculated so that patient and healthcare professional perspectives each contribute 50% to the final score. Higher scores indicate greater potential relevance of SDM for a given recommendation.
Discussion:
FOCUS offers a preliminary structured approach to better reflect SDM in CPG development by helping to identify and prioritize recommendations for which SDM may be particularly relevant. The next step is to test FOCUS within CPG development processes to assess its applicability, appropriateness, usefulness, and discriminative performance, and to inform further refinement.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation IV: Focus Charting
It typically involves three columns for recording information:
Ethical Dilemmas II
Patient-centered Care
Standards of Care II
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...