Invasive species do not exploit early growing seasons in burned tallgrass prairies
Hugh Ratcliffe1, Marissa Ahlering2, Daren Carlson3
1Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Summary
Prescribed burning effectively reduces invasive grasses in prairies. While earlier growing seasons may slightly weaken burn effectiveness on some species, burning remains a valuable conservation tool for managing invasive plants despite climate change.
Area of Science:
- Prairie Ecology
- Invasive Species Management
- Climate Change Ecology
Background:
- Native prairie ecosystems face threats from invasive species, necessitating effective management strategies.
- Prescribed burning is a known method for increasing native plant diversity and controlling invasive species.
- Climate change is altering growing season timing, potentially impacting invasive species success and management outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of prescribed burning and growing season start time on invasive species cover and frequency.
- To understand the interaction between burning and growing season phenology in prairie ecosystems.
- To assess the continued utility of prescribed burning as a conservation tool under changing climate conditions.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 853 observations from 267 transects across 25 prairie sites in Minnesota (2010-2019).
- Estimation of the impact of burning, growing season start time, and their interaction on invasive species metrics.
- Focus on relative cover and frequency as measures of invasive species abundance and dominance.
Main Results:
- Prescribed burning significantly reduced the abundance of invasive cool-season grasses and overall invasive species cover.
- The suppressive effect of burning on invasive cover persisted over time, though frequency reduction was short-lived.
- Contrary to expectations, later growing season starts increased some invasive species abundance, while earlier starts slightly reduced burn effectiveness on key invasive grasses like Kentucky bluegrass and smooth brome.
Conclusions:
- Prescribed burning remains an effective conservation tool for managing invasive species in prairie ecosystems, even with earlier growing seasons.
- Changes in growing season timing due to climate change are unlikely to be the primary driver of increased invasion in these systems.
- Further research should explore abiotic factors influencing invasive species phenology and the interaction of burn characteristics with spring conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Ecological Succession
17.8K
Ecological succession is influenced by the processes of facilitation, inhibition, and toleration. Facilitation occurs when early successional species create more favorable ecological conditions for subsequent species, such as enhanced nutrient, water, or light availability. In contrast, inhibition happens when early successional species create unfavorable ecological conditions for potential successive species, such as limiting resource availability. In some cases, later successional species...
17.8K
Non-vascular Seedless Plants
66.7K
The diverse plant life on Earth—consisting of nearly 400,000 species—can be divided into three broad categories based on biological characteristics: nonvascular, seedless vascular, and seed plants.
66.7K
Conservation of Declining Populations
9.8K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
9.8K
Seedless Vascular Plants
62.5K
Seedless Vascular Plants Were the First Tall Plants on Earth
62.5K
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores
13.8K
Plants often form mutualistic relationships with soil-dwelling fungi or bacteria to enhance their roots’ nutrient uptake ability. Root-colonizing fungi (e.g., mycorrhizae) increase a plant’s root surface area, which promotes nutrient absorption. While root-colonizing, nitrogen-fixing bacteria (e.g., rhizobia) convert atmospheric nitrogen (N2) into ammonia (NH3), making nitrogen available to plants for various biological functions. For example, nitrogen is essential for the...
13.8K
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
28.4K
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
28.4K


