Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Electronic health record developer market segmentation contributes to divide in physician interoperable exchange
Jordan Everson1, Wesley Barker1, Vaishali Patel1
1Data Analysis Branch, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, District of Columbia 20201, USA.
Physician practice size no longer predicts health data exchange in 2019, as electronic health record (EHR) developer choice became the key factor. Federal incentives partially explained the previous size disparity in interoperable exchange.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Health Services Research
- Physician Practice Management
Background:
- Interoperable exchange of health data is crucial for coordinated care.
- Previous studies indicated differences in interoperable exchange based on physician practice size.
- The influence of electronic health record (EHR) developers, federal incentives, and value-based care on these differences required further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if disparities in interoperable exchange by physician practice size persisted in 2019.
- To identify the roles of federal incentive programs, value-based care, and EHR developer selection in shaping interoperable exchange.
- To understand factors influencing health data exchange across practices of varying sizes.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional analysis of a 2019 physician survey.
- Multivariable Poisson models were used to estimate the relative risk of interoperable exchange.
- Models accounted for physician characteristics, federal incentives, value-based care, and EHR developer.
Main Results:
- In 2019, 17% of solo practices and 51% of large practices integrated outside data.
- Federal incentive programs partially mediated the relationship between practice size and interoperable exchange.
- EHR developer was strongly associated with interoperable exchange, and practice size was no longer an independent predictor.
Conclusions:
- The choice of EHR developer significantly impacts a practice's ability to engage in interoperable exchange.
- Addressing the interoperability gap requires a dual approach targeting both small EHR developers and small practices.
- Policies and initiatives should aim to increase the benefits and reduce the costs of interoperable exchange for smaller entities.
More Related Videos
09:00TBase - an Integrated Electronic Health Record and Research Database for Kidney Transplant Recipients
Published on: April 13, 2021
07:26Executing Complexity-Increasing Queries in Relational MySQL and NoSQL MongoDB and EXist Size-Growing ISO/EN 13606 Standardized EHR Databases
Published on: March 19, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Purpose of Health Records II
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Integrated Healthcare System