Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

4.0K
Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
4.0K
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

10.3K
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the...
10.3K
Errors In Hypothesis Tests01:14

Errors In Hypothesis Tests

4.7K
When performing a hypothesis test, there are four possible outcomes depending on the actual truth (or falseness) of the null hypothesis and the decision to reject or not.
4.7K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

4.2K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.2K
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

26.8K
There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p...
26.8K
Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

2.1K
Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
2.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Novel and High-Throughput Method of Isolating Single Fetal Cells Using FACS for NIPT.

Prenatal diagnosis·2026
Same author

Active surveillance of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and adverse pregnancy outcomes: A register-based cohort study.

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica·2026
Same author

The Effect of Dietary Supplements on Female Infertility in Terms of Endometrial Thickness, Pregnancy, Live Birth and Miscarriage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Nutrients·2026
Same author

Grief reactions the first year after termination of pregnancy due to fetal anomaly.

Death studies·2026
Same author

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Risk of Selected Cancers: A Danish National Register-based Cohort Study.

The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism·2026
Same author

Discrepancy in menstrual and ultrasound-based gestational age is associated with chromosomal aberrations and adverse pregnancy outcomes-Results from a nationwide cohort study.

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

56.8K

Current controversies: Null hypothesis significance testing.

Philip M Sedgwick1, Anne Hammer2,3, Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel4,5

  • 1Institute for Medical and Biomedical Education, St George's, University of London, London, UK.

Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
|April 22, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) is widely used in healthcare but often misinterpreted. This commentary highlights NHST limitations and advocates for statistical reform in clinical research.

Keywords:
clinical significancenull hypothesis significance testingp < 0.05statistical significance

More Related Videos

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

946
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

6.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget
05:57

Novel Object Recognition and Object Location Behavioral Testing in Mice on a Budget

Published on: November 20, 2018

56.8K
Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies
06:24

Establishment of Rat Models Mimicking Gender-affirming Hormone Therapies

Published on: January 10, 2025

946
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

6.8K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Statistics
  • Clinical Research Methodology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Background:

  • Null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) with a 0.05 significance level is standard in healthcare, particularly in obstetric and gynecological research.
  • NHST's application for inferring clinical significance from statistical significance is a common misunderstanding of its original purpose.
  • Limitations of NHST, including sensitivity to sample size and susceptibility to Type I and II errors, are frequently overlooked.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the historical context and inherent limitations of traditional null hypothesis significance testing (NHST).
  • To address the controversy surrounding the interpretation and application of NHST in clinical decision-making, especially in obstetric and gynecological research.
  • To propose a reconsideration of current statistical practices and advocate for a statistics reform concerning NHST.

Main Methods:

  • This commentary reviews the historical development and conceptual underpinnings of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST).
  • It analyzes the statistical and practical limitations of NHST as applied in contemporary health research.
  • The commentary synthesizes arguments against the misinterpretation of statistical significance for clinical importance.

Main Results:

  • NHST, particularly the p < 0.05 threshold, is often misapplied to infer clinical significance, leading to potential misinterpretations.
  • The reliance on NHST can result in erroneous claims regarding intervention effectiveness or the importance of risk factors.
  • Overlooking NHST's limitations, such as sample size sensitivity and error types, compromises the reliability of research findings.

Conclusions:

  • The current use of NHST in healthcare decision-making, especially in obstetric and gynecological research, is problematic due to widespread misinterpretation.
  • A significant gap exists between statistical significance (p-values) and clinical relevance, which NHST fails to adequately address.
  • There is a compelling need for a reform in statistical methodologies used in research to ensure more accurate and meaningful interpretation of results.