Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2025

Visually Based Characterization of the Incipient Particle Motion in Regular Substrates: From Laminar to Turbulent Conditions
Published on: February 22, 2018
Implicit Subgrid-Scale Modeling of a Mach 2.5 Spatially Developing Turbulent Boundary Layer.
Guillermo Araya1, Christian Lagares1
1High Performance Computing and Visualization Laboratory, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez 00681, Puerto Rico.
Implicit Large Eddy Simulation (LES) effectively models supersonic boundary layers, showing good agreement with DNS and experiments, especially in the outer flow region. Compressibility effects are weak, and the Reynolds analogy holds partially.
Area of Science:
- Fluid Dynamics
- Computational Science
Background:
- Large Eddy Simulation (LES) is adapted for subgrid-scale (SGS) modeling using streamlined upwind/Petrov-Galerkin stabilization.
- This numerical method, originally for stability, now accounts for unresolved small-scale effects in turbulent flows.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the performance of implicit LES for adiabatic supersonic turbulent boundary layers at Mach 2.5.
- To compare numerical results with direct numerical simulation (DNS) data and experimental literature.
- To investigate compressibility effects and the validity of the Reynolds analogy.
Main Methods:
- Employed numerically implicit subgrid-scale modeling with streamlined upwind/Petrov-Galerkin stabilization.
- Utilized a dynamic rescaling-recycling approach for turbulent inflow conditions in high-speed flows.
- Performed direct comparison with DNS database and literature experiments for adiabatic supersonic boundary layers.
Main Results:
- Implicit LES showed good performance for mean flow characteristics (Cf, UVD+) on Mach 2.5 adiabatic flat plates.
- A longer power law behavior was observed for mean streamwise velocity in the outer region compared to the log law.
- While overpredicting peak stresses in the buffer layer, iLES achieved excellent agreement for turbulence intensities and Reynolds shear stresses in the outer region.
Conclusions:
- Implicit LES is a viable approach for simulating adiabatic supersonic turbulent boundary layers.
- The method demonstrates strong predictive capabilities, particularly for outer flow region turbulence statistics.
- Compressibility effects on thermal turbulent structures are weak, and the Reynolds analogy holds to a lesser extent than in incompressible flows.
Related Concept Videos
Boundary Layer Characteristics
Laminar and Turbulent Flow
Bernoulli's Equation for Flow Along a Streamline
Turbulent Flow
Bernoulli's Equation for Flow Normal to a Streamline
The pressure difference depends on the fluid's velocity and radius of curvature. The pressure variation is minimal in flows with nearly straight streamlines.
Turbulent Flow: Problem Solving
Temperature is a key factor in CO2 solubility. In this case, the CO2 gas and the liquid are cooled to 20°C. Lower temperatures...

