Minimal Contact Robotic Stroke Rehabilitation on Risk of COVID-19, Work Efficiency and Sensorimotor Function

Patients with hemiparetic stroke undergo direct, labor-intensive hands-on conventional physical therapy to improve sensorimotor function, spasticity, balance, trunk stability, and activities of daily living (ADLs). Currently, direct, intensive hands-on therapeutic modalities have increased concerns during the coronavirus (COVID-19) global pandemic. We developed an innovative Walkbot to mitigate the issues surrounding conventional hands-on physical therapy. We aimed to compare the effects of minimal-contact robotic rehabilitation (MRR) and full-contact conventional rehabilitation (FCR) on static and dynamic balance, trunk stability, ADLs, spasticity, and cognition changes in patients with hemiparetic stroke. A total of 64 patients with hemiparetic stroke (mean age = 66.38 ± 13.17; 27 women) underwent either MRR or FCR three times/week for 6 weeks. Clinical outcome measurements included the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), the modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), the Fugl—Meyer Assessment (FMA), and the modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores. A 2 × 2 repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed, and an independent t-test was used to determine statistical differences in the physiotherapists’ work efficiency and COVID-19 transmission risk. The ANOVA showed that MRR had effects superior to those of FCR on the TIS, the BBS, the FMA, and the MBI (p < 0.05), but not on the MAS (p = 0.230). MRR showed a greater decrease on the physiotherapist’s work efficiency and COVID-19 transmission risk (p < 0.05). Our results provide clinical evidence that robot-assisted locomotor training helps maximize the recovery of sensorimotor function, abnormal synergy, balance, ADLs, and trunk stability, and facilitates a safer environment and less labor demand than conventional stroke rehabilitation.