Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025
Ye's Swing Technique for Small-incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery
Published on: June 27, 2025
A meta-analysis of visual outcomes and optical quality after small incision lenticule extraction versus implantable
1Department of Ophthalmology, 34732Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Objective:
To evaluate possible differences in visual outcome and optical quality when small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus implantable collamer lens (ICL) is used to correct myopia.
Methods:
PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to August 2021 to identify relevant studies. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. Primary outcomes were postoperative efficacy, safety, and predictability at the end of follow-up. Secondary outcomes were changes in modulation transfer function cutoff frequency (MTF cut-off), objective scatter index (OSI) values, total higher-order aberrations (HOAs), spherical aberrations, and coma aberrations.
Results:
Seven studies with a total of 1296 eyes (SMILE: 731 eyes; TECXL: 565 eyes) were included. The ICL group had a better MTF cut-off (P = 0.007) and less change in the proportion of HOAs (P < 0.001), spherical aberrations (P = 0.009), and coma (P = 0.006) than the SMILE group. For the other outcomes, there were no statistically significant differences.
Conclusions:
SMILE and ICL implantation are comparable in efficacy, safety, and predictability for correcting myopia. Larger studies with longer follow-up times are warranted to provide a better understanding of the benefits of SMILE and ICL implantation.
More Related Videos
05:14Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
