Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Standards of Care II

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:

Ethical Dilemmas II

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical Dilemmas I

Ethical dilemmas in nursing are of utmost importance, as they often arise from the tension between adhering to core ethical principles and the practical realities of healthcare delivery. These dilemmas require nurses to navigate complex situations where competing ethical considerations pull them in different directions.
Let us explore some examples to understand the potentially complex moral decisions nurses face.
Take the case of caring for minors, particularly in areas related to reproductive...

Ethical Issues

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:

Nursing Ethical Principles II

Nursing Ethical Principles II

Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's...

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III

Nurse-to-nurse relationships are legally required to adhere to professional standards, ensuring a respectful and positive working environment. Professional conduct demands that nurses treat all colleagues respectfully and courteously, fostering a productive, supportive workplace. Nurses must actively eliminate bullying, discrimination, and harassment to maintain a safe and inclusive environment.
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same authorSame journal

Banning Gender-Affirming Treatment for Minors: The Supreme Court Speaks.

The Hastings Center report·2026

Same author

Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine: How Conscience Protections Preserved Mifepristone Access.

The Hastings Center report·2025

Same author

Residency Requirements for Medical Aid in Dying.

The Hastings Center report·2024

Same author

Cruzan after Dobbs: What Remains of the Constitutional Right to Refuse Treatment?

The Hastings Center report·2023

Same author

Medical choices and changing selves.

Journal of medical ethics·2023

Same author

Ourselves, with Dementia.

The Hastings Center report·2022

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

The UN Challenge to Guardianship and Surrogate Decision-Making.

Rebecca Dresser

The Hastings Center Report

|April 27, 2022

Summary

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities promotes supportive decision-making for individuals with intellectual disabilities. This approach emphasizes personal choice over guardianship, impacting medical decision-making guidance.

Keywords:

bioethics decision-making capacity guardianship legal capacity supportive decision-making

More Related Videos

Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness

Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: July 11, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness

Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation and Electroencephalographic Assessment in Disorders of Consciousness

Published on: July 11, 2025

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Area of Science:

Disability Studies
Bioethics
International Law

Background:

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) was issued in 2006.
The CRPD advocates for replacing guardianship and substitute decision-making with supported decision-making for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze the implications of the CRPD's call for supported decision-making.
To provide guidance for clinicians, ethicists, and legal professionals on evaluating medical decision-making for individuals with cognitive impairments.

Main Methods:

Review of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its commentary.
Analysis of ethical and legal considerations surrounding supported decision-making.

Main Results:

The Convention urges a shift from guardianship to supported decision-making, respecting individual "will and preferences."
Critics have raised ethical and legal concerns regarding this shift.

Conclusions:

The CRPD provides crucial guidance for medical decision-making involving individuals with cognitive impairments.
The Convention promotes greater autonomy and involvement of people with cognitive disabilities in life decisions.