Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Case Study #2: James Madison University.

Kyle G Gipson1, Kurtis G Paterson1

  • 1Department of Engineering, Harrisonburg, Virginia, USA.

New Directions for Student Leadership
|April 28, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessing source characteristics of PM2.5 in the eastern United States using positive matrix factorization.

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)·2004
Same journal

Using ePortfolios to Assess the Influence of Community Engagement on Undergraduates' Socially Responsible Leadership Development.

New directions for student leadership·2026
Same journal

Student Leadership Development in a Gen-AI Higher Education Landscape: Four Imperatives for the Future.

New directions for student leadership·2026
Same journal

Practice of Active Waiting: Leadership Education Curricula in Uncertain Times.

New directions for student leadership·2026
Same journal

The Sisterhood Paradox: Leadership Learning, Thriving, and Risk in Sorority Communities.

New directions for student leadership·2026
Same journal

Leading in the (Mis)Information Age: Digital Media Literacy as Essential Leadership Learning.

New directions for student leadership·2026
Same journal

Unseen Architecture: General Principles in Framing Thriving as Leadership Learning.

New directions for student leadership·2026
See all related articles

The Madison Engineering Leadership Development program integrates technical skills with essential soft skills for engineers. This approach aims to cultivate well-rounded leaders capable of effective teamwork and inspiration.

Area of Science:

  • Engineering Education
  • Leadership Development
  • Professional Skills Training

Background:

  • Traditional engineering education often prioritizes technical expertise.
  • There is a growing need for engineers to possess strong leadership and interpersonal skills.
  • The Madison Engineering Leadership Development program was designed to address this gap.

Observation:

  • The program combines rigorous technical training with character development.
  • Emphasis is placed on understanding core values and ethical conduct.
  • Participants engage in activities focused on teamwork, relationship management, and motivational techniques.

Findings:

  • The curriculum is structured to enhance both technical mastery and value-added soft skills.
  • It aims to foster engineers who are not only technically proficient but also effective leaders.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Key components include team collaboration, communication, and inspirational leadership training.

    • Implications:

    • Graduates are expected to exhibit improved leadership capabilities in engineering contexts.
    • The program contributes to developing a new generation of engineers with holistic skill sets.
    • This model offers a framework for enhancing engineering leadership development programs globally.