Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2025

Phthalic Acid Ester-Binding DNA Aptamer Selection, Characterization, and Application to an Electrochemical Aptasensor
Published on: March 21, 2018
Surface blocking of azolla modified copper electrode for trace determination of phthalic acid esters as the molecular
Maryam Darvishi1, Shahab Shariati1, Fariba Safa1
1Department of Chemistry, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University Rasht Iran shariaty@iaurasht.ac.ir +981333402718.
Abstract:
In this work, a sensitive and efficient voltammetric biosensor was introduced for differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) determination of some phthalic acid esters (PAEs) including dibutyl phthalate (DBP), dimethyl phthalate (DMP), di(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) and dicyclohexyl phthalate (DCHP) in aqueous solutions. Briefly, the surface of a copper electrode was modified by azolla paste prepared using azolla powder and electroencephalography gel (EEG). The modified surface was characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) analysis and energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) methods. Determination of PAEs was conducted based on their blocking effect on the electrode surface for ferrous ion oxidation. The central composite design (CCD) was conducted to optimize the effects of four experimental parameters including the concentration of Fe2+ ions (C Fe ) and supporting electrolyte (C sup. elec), solution pH and modifier/gel mass ratio on the decrease in the anodic peak current of ferrous ions as the response. Predicted optimal conditions (C Fe = 319 μM, C sup. elec= 0.125 M, pH = 7.52 and modifier/gel mass ratio = 0.19) were validated by experimental checking which resulted in an error of 1.453%. At the optimum conditions, linear relationships were found between the DPV responses and PAEs concentrations and the limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) values were in the ranges of 0.2-0.4 μg L-1 and 0.5-1.0 μg L-1, respectively. Good recovery percentages ranging from 97.3 to 100.3% with RSD < 3.2% suggested the proposed method for efficient, accurate and quick determination of PAEs in real water samples.
More Related Videos
10:48Electrochemical Preparation of Poly3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene Layers on Gold Microelectrodes for Uric Acid-Sensing Applications
Published on: July 28, 2021
08:22Ultrasensitive Detection of Biomarkers by Using a Molecular Imprinting Based Capacitive Biosensor
Published on: February 16, 2018