Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

457
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
457

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effects of spoiler types on audience immersion: an inter-subject correlation study of heart rate.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Effects of dual-message tactile sliding takeover requests on takeover performance in an automated driving system.

Traffic injury prevention·2024
Same author

Aesthetic Evaluation of Computer Icons: Visual Pattern Differences Between Art-Trained and Lay Raters of Icons.

Perceptual and motor skills·2020
Same author

The contents of visual working memory delay the perceived offset of matching visual stimuli.

Acta psychologica·2019
Same author

The color-word Stroop effect driven by working memory maintenance.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2019
Same author

Subcellular distribution of RAD23B controls XPC degradation and DNA damage repair in response to chemotherapy drugs.

Cellular signalling·2017
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Listeners near-optimally integrate acoustic and semantic cues in spoken word recognition: Evidence from experiments manipulating cue order and reliability.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.9K

Revisiting congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task.

Yi Pan1, Zheyu Zhang2, Xinkui Hu3,4

  • 1Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, China. yipan@hznu.edu.cn.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|May 2, 2022
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The working memory Stroop task reveals that semantic congruency primarily facilitates performance, with minimal interference. This contrasts with the classic Stroop effect, highlighting distinct cognitive mechanisms.

Keywords:
AttentionFacilitation · InterferenceStroop effectWorking memory

More Related Videos

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.0K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Sep 24, 2025

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
05:31

Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task

Published on: February 26, 2020

14.9K
Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color
10:27

Training Synesthetic Letter-color Associations by Reading in Color

Published on: February 20, 2014

23.0K
A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

13.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • The working memory Stroop task involves naming a color patch while retaining a color word, with prior research indicating congruency impacts performance.
  • Existing studies show semantic incongruence worsens performance in the working memory Stroop task compared to congruence.
  • The precise cognitive mechanisms behind these congruency effects in working memory tasks remain incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying congruency effects in the working memory Stroop task.
  • To differentiate between facilitation and interference in the working memory Stroop effect.
  • To compare the working memory Stroop effect with the classic Stroop effect regarding facilitation and interference.

Main Methods:

  • A working memory Stroop task was employed, incorporating congruent, incongruent, and control conditions.
  • Participants performed color naming while holding a color word in working memory.
  • Performance metrics were analyzed to quantify facilitation and interference effects.

Main Results:

  • The working memory Stroop effect is predominantly characterized by facilitation, with interference being significantly smaller.
  • A notable contrast exists between the working memory and classic Stroop effects, with larger facilitation and less interference in the former.
  • Working memory for a color word can be modulated by the perceptual judgment of an interposed color patch, showing both facilitation and interference based on semantic congruency.

Conclusions:

  • Both facilitation and interference mechanisms contribute to the overall congruency effects observed in the working memory Stroop task.
  • The findings suggest distinct cognitive processes are engaged in the working memory variant compared to the classic Stroop task.
  • Understanding these mechanisms provides deeper insights into the interplay between perception, working memory, and semantic processing.