Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2025

A Semantic Priming Event-related Potential ERP Task to Study Lexico-semantic and Visuo-semantic Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published on: April 12, 2018
Symbolic number comparison and number priming do not rely on the same mechanism
1Department of Cognitive Psychology, Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. krajcsi@gmail.com.
The comparison distance effect and priming distance effect in number processing do not correlate. This suggests distinct mechanisms underlie number comparison and number priming, challenging the approximate number system model.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Mathematical Cognition
Background:
- The comparison distance effect and priming distance effect are key phenomena in elementary symbolic number processing.
- Current models, like the approximate number system model, propose a shared mechanism for both effects.
- Alternative models, such as the discrete semantic system model, suggest distinct underlying generators.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between the comparison distance effect and the priming distance effect in symbolic number processing.
- To address the reliability of these effects, ensuring that a null result is not due to low measurement precision.
- To provide empirical evidence to differentiate between models of number processing.
Main Methods:
- A correlational study design was employed to examine the relationship between the two effects.
- The reliability of both the comparison distance effect and the priming distance effect was carefully assessed and controlled for.
- Statistical analyses were conducted to determine the strength of the correlation between the measured effects.
Main Results:
- No significant correlation was found between the comparison distance effect and the priming distance effect.
- The results remained consistent even after accounting for the reliability of the measures.
- This indicates that the two phenomena are largely independent.
Conclusions:
- The findings support models of elementary number processing that posit separate mechanisms for number comparison and number priming.
- The approximate number system model, which assumes a common mechanism, is less supported by these results.
- This research contributes to understanding the distinct cognitive processes involved in symbolic number manipulation.
Related Concept Videos
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Serial Position Effect
Implicit Memories
One key aspect of implicit...
Piaget's Stage 2 of Cognitive Development
First Impression
Sign Test for Matched Pairs
To conduct the sign test, we first calculate the differences in...

